Streptomyces sp. JCK-7385 Effectively Controls Fusarium Head Blight in Rice and Wheat

Article information

Plant Pathol J. 2025;41(6):800-819
Publication date (electronic) : 2025 December 1
doi : https://doi.org/10.5423/PPJ.OA.09.2025.0126
1Department of Agricultural Chemistry, Institute of Environmentally Friendly Agriculture, College of Agriculture and Life Science, Chonnam National University, Gwangju 61186, Korea
2Plant Healthcare Research Institute, JAN153 Biotech Incorporated, Jeongeup 56212, Korea
3Department of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA
4Laboratory of Sustainable Development in Natural Resources and Environment, Institute for Advanced Study in Technology, Ton Duc Thang University, Ho Chi Minh City 70000, Vietnam
5Faculty of Environment and Labour Safety, Ton Duc Thang University, Ho Chi Minh City 70000, Vietnam
*Corresponding author. Phone) +82-62-530-2132, FAX) +82-62-530-2139, E-mail) kjinc@jnu.ac.kr
Handling Editor : Kyunghun Min
Received 2025 September 12; Revised 2025 October 1; Accepted 2025 October 20.

Abstract

Fusarium head blight (FHB) primarily caused by Fusarium species including F. graminearum and F. asiaticum, is a major fungal disease affecting wheat, rice, and other cereal crops worldwide. Chemical fungicides remain the primary means of FHB management owing to their convenience and efficacy. Nonetheless, the overuse of chemical pesticides has led to fungicide resistance, human health effects, and environmental contamination, driving a shift toward biocontrol agents as sustainable alternatives for managing plant pathogens. This study aims to evaluate Streptomyces sp. JCK-7385, a rice-associated isolate, is an environmentally friendly biocontrol agent against FHB. The strain produced indole-3-acetic acid, siderophore, and 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid deaminase, as well as extracellular enzymes including cellulase, gelatinase, and chitinase. JCK-7385 treatments induced defense-related marker gene PR1 expression in transgenic Arabidopsis, as confirmed via β-glucuronidase assays, suggesting an induced resistance mechanism. In greenhouse trials, the JCK-7385 cell suspension and its suspension concentrate formulation (JCK-7385 SC) at a 2,000-fold concentration effectively reduced FHB incidence in rice by 42.3% and 52.5%, respectively. JCK-7385 SC also maintained high efficacy (54.4% control value) after storage at 45°C for 6 weeks. Furthermore, the integrated treatment of JCK-7385 SC and the chemical fungicide (Peulrei) significantly enhanced FHB control compared to single treatments, achieving 63.3% and 71.7% efficacy in rice and wheat, respectively. Field trials demonstrated that this collaborative treatment effectively suppressed FHB development in rice by 52.0%, outperforming individual applications. These findings suggest that Streptomyces sp. JCK-7385 has strong potential as a biological fungicide for FHB management through an induced resistance mechanism.

Rice is cultivated on approximately 161 million acres worldwide, yielding 678.7 million tons annually. Of this, Asia accounts for approximately 143 million acres and produces 612 million tons (Asibi et al., 2019). Conversely, wheat production needs to increase to meet the demands of a global population projected to approach nine billion in 2050 (Figueroa et al., 2018). However, Fusarium head blight (FHB) commonly called scab, is a destructive fungal disease affecting major grain crops such as wheat, barley, maize, and rice caused by members of the Fusarium graminearum species complex. The primary causative agents of FHB are F. graminearum and F. asiaticum species (Goswami and Kistler, 2005; Lee et al., 2010; McMullen et al., 2012; Starkey et al., 2007). Infected cereals suffer significant reductions in grain yield and quality, and the contaminated grain is often laden with trichothecene mycotoxins and estrogenic compounds (Kim et al., 2005). Yield losses attributed to FHB can reach up to 80% under severe epidemics (Alisaac and Mahlein, 2023). Among the mycotoxins of great concern are the trichothecenes deoxynivalenol, nivalenol, and HT2/T2, along with the estrogenic mycotoxin zearalenone (Bottalico and Perrone, 2002).

Various strategies have been employed to manage FHB, including agronomic practices, chemical control, and breeding for resistance (Dill-Macky and Jones, 2000; Dweba et al., 2017; Jia et al., 2018; Jouany, 2007; Shah et al., 2018). However, these methods face significant drawbacks: agronomic practices are highly dependent on environmental conditions; chemical control can lead to fungicide resistance and ecological pollution; and breeding programs are time-consuming, often yielding only a limited number of partially resistant cultivars (Anderson et al., 2020; Chen et al., 2021b; Parry et al., 1995; Trail et al., 2002; Wegulo et al., 2015; Zhao et al., 2022). These limitations have spurred interest in biological control agents (BCAs) as environmentally sustainable alternatives. BCAs suppress pathogens through direct mechanisms such as parasitism and antibiosis, as well as indirect mechanisms such as the induction of host resistance, competition for resources, and growth promotion (Legrand et al., 2017). Several antagonist microorganisms can manage FHB, including Bacillus spp., Pseudomonas spp., Trichoderma spp., and Streptomyces spp. (Torres et al., 2019). The control strategies can reduce disease severity and mycotoxin levels, no individual strategy offers significant control under conditions highly conducive to FHB development, indicating that integrated management approaches are regarded as the most effective strategy for mitigating FHB (Shude et al., 2020).

Among BCAs, Streptomyces spp., a group of Gram-positive filamentous actinobacteria have gained significant attention owing to their capacity to produce diverse antimicrobial metabolites and to activate host defense responses (Gopalakrishnan et al., 2020). Previous reports show that numerous Streptomyces sp. strains suppress FHB via direct and indirect mechanisms (Colombo et al., 2019; De Troyer et al., 2025; Jung et al., 2013; Mouloud et al., 2015; Tian et al., 2024). Indirect mechanisms referred to as induced resistance of plants operate mainly via two pathways, including systemic acquired resistance (SAR) and induced systemic resistance (ISR). SAR is typically triggered via pathogen invasion and is mediated via salicylic acid (SA) signaling, leading to the activation of pathogenesis-related genes (Kamle et al., 2020; Pieterse et al., 2014). ISR is triggered via interactions between plants and beneficial rhizosphere microorganisms and is mediated primarily via jasmonic acid and ethylene signaling pathways (Knoester et al., 1999; Li et al., 2004; Pieterse et al., 2014). Previous studies show that the expression level of the pathogenesis-related gene 1 (PR1) gene serves as a reliable marker for the activation of SA-mediated signaling pathways (Niu et al., 2012; Park and Kloepper, 2000).

Following the report of Hazra and Purkait (2019), pesticide formulations are designed to facilitate efficient production, storage, transport, and field application, thereby ensuring safety, convenience, and cost-effectiveness. Therefore, formulation types that combine BCAs with other components represent a promising approach for long-term preservation and quality assurance (Palazzini et al., 2013, 2016). To our knowledge, few studies have systematically explored the application of Streptomyces-mediated induced resistance, field-stable formulation development, and their potential synergy with fungicides in FHB management.

Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the potential of an endophytic Streptomyces strain, JCK-7385, for the sustainable management of FHB. Specifically, we (1) screened its ability to induce plant resistance, (2) assessed its biocontrol efficacy against FHB, (3) developed a stable suspension concentrate (SC) formulation, and (4) investigated its integrated application with a chemical fungicide.

Materials and Methods

Bacterial strain isolation from rice

To isolate strains with antifungal activity against phytopathogenic fungi and potential resistance-inducing mechanisms, rice samples were collected from experimental fields at Chonnam National University and from cultivated fields in Gokseong, Republic of Korea. The collected plant materials were divided into leaf, stem, root, and grain sections. Following the isolation method described by Stoltzfus et al. (1997), with minor modifications, each 10 g subsample was suspended in 100 mL of sterile distilled water (SDW) and homogenized. The mixtures were then filtered through a 4-layer cheesecloth, and the resulting filtrates were diluted (100-, 40-, 1,000-, and 100-fold for leaves, stems, roots, and grains, respectively). From each dilution, 100 μL was spread onto tryptic soy agar plates (TSA; Becton, Dickinson and Co., Sparks, MD, USA) and incubated at 30°C for 1 to 3 days. Single colonies were subsequently cultured in tryptic soy broth (TSB; Becton, Dickinson and Co.) at 30°C with shaking at 150 rpm for 24 h. Each isolate was preserved at −80°C in 30% glycerol for long-term storage (Le et al., 2021). A total of 606 strains were isolated in this study.

Screening of antifungal and plant resistance-inducing activity using an isolated strain

The culture conditions of isolated strains. The strains were first cultured on TSA medium at 30°C for 24 h. A single colony was then transferred into TSB medium to prepare a seed culture (pre-culture) in a shaking incubator at 30°C and 150 rpm. After 24 h of incubation, 1% (v/v) of the pre-culture was inoculated into fresh TSB medium and incubated under the same conditions for 2 days to obtain the main culture. The resulting culture broth (CB) was centrifuged to obtain the cell pellet (Cell) and supernatant. The axenic culture filtrate (CF) was prepared via filtering the supernatant through a 0.2 μm hydrophilic syringe filter (Minisarts, Sartorius, Goettingen, Germany).

Dual culture bioassay

The JCK-7385 strain was tested for its ability to inhibit mycelial growth of F. graminearum and F. asiaticum using a dual-culture assay on agar plates. A 2-day-old JCK-7385 CB was streaked in a straight line 2 cm from the edge of the potato dextrose agar (PDA; Becton, Dickinson and Co.) plate, and a 5-day-old pathogen agar plug was placed on the opposite side, approximately 5 cm away. PDA plates inoculated only with the pathogen served as untreated controls. Plates were incubated at 25°C for 5–7 days (Singh et al., 2019).

Histochemical β-glucuronidase assay in Arabidopsis leaves plants

The plant resistance-inducing activity of isolated strains were conducted using the transgenic Arabidopsis thaliana plants expressing β-glucuronidase (GUS) fused to the PR1 promoter (Park et al., 2020). The plants were prepared and cultured following the methods as described previously (Yeo et al., 2024). The JCK-7385 samples were diluted in SDW at 500-, 1,000-, 2,000-, and 4,000-fold, and each dilution was added to a 24-well plate in triplicate. Subsequently, two 12-day-old Arabidopsis thaliana plants were placed in each well and incubated at 25°C on an orbital shaker for 2 days. SA served as a positive control, and TSB medium as a negative control. Histochemical GUS staining was conducted as described previously (Kondo et al., 2014). After 2 days of incubation, plants were immersed in 90% acetone in 2 mL Eppendorf tubes at 4°C for 1 h to fix the tissues, then washed twice with 0.1 M sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.0) in 24-well plates. The washed plants were immersed in GUS staining solution containing 0.1% Triton-X, 100 mM sodium phosphate buffer, 2.5 mM potassium ferrocyanide, 2.5 mM potassium ferricyanide, and 2 mM X-GlucA (Duchefa, X1405). The plates were incubated overnight in a water bath at 30°C. The reaction was stopped via incubating the stained plants in 70% ethanol for 1 h, followed by several washing in 90% ethanol for 1 h to remove chlorophyll. The activity was assessed via the presence of blue coloration and observed under an optical microscope (Yeo et al., 2024).

Identification of the JCK-7385 strain

The JCK-7385 strain was incubated in TSB medium at 30°C, with shaking at 150 rpm for 2 days. Genomic DNA was extracted using the i-genomic BYF DNA Extraction Mini Kit (iNtRON Biotechnology, Inc., Seongnam, Korea) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. To identify the JCK-7385 strain, the 16S rRNA and four housekeeping genes including atpD, recA, ropB, and trpB were amplified. Primer pairs are listed in Supplementary Table 1, and amplification conditions were applied as described previously (Guo et al., 2008). Phylogenetic trees were constructed using the neighbor-joining method for the 16S rRNA gene and concentrated sequences of the four housekeeping genes (Saitou and Nei, 1987). Sequence alignment was conducted using MEGA X software, and sequences were manually trimmed at the same position before further analysis and submission to the National Center for Biotechnology Information database (Kumar et al., 2018b).

Biochemical characterization of the JCK-7385 strain

Indole-3-acetic acid production

The JCK-7385 CF strain was used to confirm the production of the plant growth hormone indole-3-acetic acid (IAA). The strain was cultured in TSB medium supplemented with 150 mg/L L-tryptophan at 30°C and 150 rpm for 2 days. The JCK-7385 CB was centrifuged at 13,000 rpm for 5 min at 4°C, and the supernatant was filtered through a 0.2 μm syringe filter. Subsequently, 1 mL of the CF was mixed with 2 mL of Salkowski’s reagent (150 mL H2SO4, 250 mL sterile water, 7.5 mL of 0.5 M FeCl3·6H2O) and incubated in the dark at 25°C for 20 min (De Oliveira-Longatti et al., 2014). TSB medium containing 150 mg/L L-tryptophan served as the negative control. The IAA production was indicated via the appearance of a pink coloration in the mixture.

Siderophore production

An experiment was conducted to verify siderophore production via the JCK-7385 strain using Chrome Azurol S (CAS) agar medium, prepared as previously described (Louden et al., 2011). A 2-day-old CB of the JCK-7385 strain was applied in volumes of 20, 40, and 60 μL onto sterile paper disks placed on CAS agar plates. Sterile TSB medium served as the negative control. The plates were incubated at 30°C for 7 days. Siderophore production was indicated via the formation of an orange halo around the paper disks, and the ratio of halo diameter to colony diameter was calculated as a quantitative measure.

1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid deaminase production

1-Aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid (ACC) deaminase production via the JCK-7385 strain was conducted as follows: 1 mL of JCK-7385 CB was cultured in 50 mL of Dworkin and Foster (DF) broth medium and incubated for 24 h at 25 to 30°C with shaking at 200 rpm. The DF medium was prepared as follows: trace elements (10 mg H3BO3, 11.19 mg MnSO4·H2O, 124.6 mg ZnSO4·7H2O, 78.22 mg CuSO4·5H2O, and 10 mg MoO3) were dissolved in 100 mL of SDW and stored in the refrigerator. FeSO4·7H2O (100 mg) was dissolved in 10 mL of SDW and stored in the refrigerator. All of the other ingredients, including 4.0 g KH2PO4, 6.0 g Na2HPO4, 0.2 g MgSO4·7H2O, 2.0 g glucose, 2.0 g gluconic acid, 2.0 g citric acid, 2.0 g (NH4)2SO4, and 0.1 mL of each of the trace element and FeSO4·7H2O solutions, were dissolved in 1 L of distilled water and autoclaved. Moreover, the DF agar medium was prepared with the same materials and included 1.8% Bacto agar (Becton, Dickinson and Co.), then autoclaved and poured into Petri dishes. After 24 h, 1 mL of the culture was transferred to 50 mL of sterile DF minimal salts medium in a 250-mL flask containing 3.0 mM ACC, replacing (NH4)2SO4 as the nitrogen source, under the same conditions (Penrose and Glick, 2003). Following incubation in DF medium supplemented with ACC, the JCK-7385 CB was streaked using a loop onto DF agar plates containing 30 μmol ACC. Sterile TSB medium served as the negative control.

Extracellular enzymes activity

The extracellular enzyme activity of the JCK-7385 strain was evaluated using the clear zone method (Abbasi et al., 2019). The media compositions were as follows: chitinase (1% colloidal chitin, 1.5% agar), cellulase (0.4% carboxymethyl cellulose [CMC] sodium, 1.5% agar), and gelatinase media (10% gelatinase, 1.5% agar). Colloidal chitin was prepared as previously described (Hsu and Lockwood, 1975). Sterile paper disks were placed on each medium, and 20, 40, and 60 μL of JCK-7385 CF obtained from a 2-day-old CB were dispensed onto the disks to determine the extracellular enzyme activity. A sterile TSB medium served as the negative control, and all experiments were conducted in triplicate. The plates were incubated at 30°C for 1 to 7 days. Gelatinase activity was assessed directly, whereas Lugol’s solution (2.5 g/L iodine and 5 g/L potassium iodide) was applied to stain the chitinase and cellulase media plates to visualize the halo zones.

Formulation of the JCK-7385 strain

The JCK-7385 strain was formulated for use in the GUS assay and to evaluate its disease control efficacy against FHB in rice. Two types of formulations including wettable powder (WP) and SC formulations were prepared as follows: oxidized starch (Floset light) was added to a 2-day-old TSB CB of JCK-7385 at a concentration of 20% and then spray-dried. Spray drying conditions included: inlet temperature at 140°C, air flow at 10 m3/h, de-block at 50, and pump at 10 rpm. WP and SC formulations were prepared using the spray-dried JCK-7385 material. For the WP formulation (100 g total), the composition included spray-dried JCK-7385 (10 g), white carbon (15 g), sodium dodecyl sulfate (CR-SDS, 12.5 g), naphthalenesulfonic acid (CR-WP100, 12.5 g), and kaolin (50 g). Moreover, to prepare 1 L of JCK-7385 SC, the composition was spray-dried JCK-7385 (100 g), blend of sodium dioctyl sulfosuccinate and TSP ethoxylates (CR-NF135B, 30 mL), propylene glycol (50 mL), 1.0% xanthan gum solution (100 mL), sodium benzoate (2 g), antifoam emulsion (CR-SAG672, 1 mL), and distilled water (719 mL) (Yeo et al., 2024).

Disease control efficacy of JCK-7385 against FHB in rice under greenhouse conditions

Plant preparation and growth conditions of rice

Rice seeds (Oryza sativa cv. Samkwang) were used to evaluate the disease control efficacy of JCK-7385 against FHB under greenhouse conditions. Detailed methods of seed preparation and plant growth conditions are provided in the Supplementary Material.

Single treatment application

The JCK-7385 strain was cultured in TSB medium at 30°C, 150 rpm for 2 days to obtain a CB standardized to OD600 = 0.8. The culture was centrifuged at 10,000 rpm for 10 min, and the supernatant was filtered through a 0.2 μm membrane filter to obtain the axenic CF. CB, CF, cell suspension, and formulations (WP and SC) of JCK-7385 were diluted 1,000- and 2,000-fold in distilled water containing Tween 20 at a concentration of 500 μg/mL. JCK-7385 treatments were applied twice as foliar sprays at the booting and heading stages, with a 1-week interval (2 weeks before inoculation [2WBI] and 1WBI). Distilled water containing 500 μg/mL Tween 20 served as the negative control. A synthetic fungicide, Peulrei (13% propiconazole + 13% difenoconazole EC; Syngenta, Iksan, Korea), served as a positive control at a 2,000-fold dilution and was applied 1 day before inoculation (DBI).

The pathogen was inoculated at the flowering stage—7 days after the 2WBI treatment of samples and 1 day after the positive control treatment using a Fusarium asiaticum 031 spore suspension isolated from the infected rice tissues. The pathogen was cultured on PDA at 25°C for 5 days. Agar plugs containing F. asiaticum 031 mycelia were transferred to CMC broth and incubated at 25°C and 150 rpm under light for 7 days. After incubation, the spore suspension was collected via filtering using four layers of Miracloth to remove mycelia and agar plugs (Strange and Smith, 1971). Spore concentration was determined using a hemocytometer under a microscope (Axio Imager.A2, Carl Zeiss, Yena, Germany). The density of the spore suspension was adjusted to 2.0 × 105 spores/mL, and then Tween 20 was added at 500 μg/mL concentration. Rice panicles were inoculated via spraying 1.6 mL of the spore suspension per panicle. Disease severity was evaluated 7 days after inoculation using a visible scale from 0–100%. The experiment was conducted in triplicate, with each replicate consisting of six panicles. Disease severity, disease incidence, FHB index, and control value of the FHB index were calculated using the following equations (Yeo et al., 2024):

Disease severity (%)=Percentage of infected grains among the treated grainsDisease incidence (%)=Percentage of infected spikes among the treated spikesFHB index=(Disease severity×Disease incidence)/100Control value of the FHB index (%)=FHB index of control-FHB index of treatmentFHB index of control×100

JCK-7385 SC shelf-life. The JCK-7385 SC formulation was prepared as described above and stored in an oven at 45°C for 18, 15, 12, 9, and 6 weeks, corresponding to 3, 2.5, 2, 1.5, and 1 year of the efficacy warranty period, respectively (National Laws of the Republic of Korea, 2023). The JCK-7385 SC samples were diluted 2,000-fold and supplemented with 500 μg/mL Tween 20, then applied twice as foliar sprays at the booting and heading stages with a 1-week interval (2WBI and 1WBI). Distilled water containing 500 μg/mL Tween 20 served as the negative control. The synthetic fungicide, Peulrei (2,000-fold dilution) was applied 1DBI as the positive control. Pathogen preparation, inoculation, and assessment were described in the previous experiment.

Integrated treatment application

The study by Singh and Chhatpar (2011) performed the integrated treatment of Streptomyces sp. and chemical fungicide to control the Fusarium sp. disease. In this study, the treatment was prepared with modifications: the JCK-7385 SC at a 2,000-fold dilution was applied twice as foliar sprays at the booting and heading stages with a 1-week interval (2WBI and 1WBI). Distilled water containing 500 μg/mL Tween 20 served as the negative control, while the chemical fungicide, Peulrei (2,000-fold dilution) was applied 1DBI as the positive control. Additionally, three integrated treatments containing JCK-7385 SC and Peulrei were tested to control FHB: 2WBI + 1WBI/1DBI; 2WBI/1DBI; and 1WBI/1DBI. Pathogen preparation, inoculation, and assessment were conducted as described in the previous experiment.

Disease control efficacy of JCK-7385 against FHB in wheat under greenhouse conditions

Eunpamil wheat seeds (Triticum aestivum L.) were used to evaluate the disease control efficacy of JCK-7385 SC against FHB under greenhouse conditions. To sterilize the seeds, they were placed in an ice bucket and treated with the synthetic fungicide Spotak (25% prochloraz EC, Syngenta) at a 2,000-fold dilution for 2 h. Following sterilization, the seeds were immersed in water overnight in a 30°C incubator for germination. Wheat seeds were sown in a 105-well tray filled with autoclaved rice nursery soil at three seeds per well. The trays were maintained in a cooling chamber at 10 ± 2°C for 3 weeks under a 16 h/8 h light/dark cycle. After 3 weeks, the seedlings were transplanted into plastic pots (nine seedlings per pot) containing a 1:1 mixture of nursery soil (Punong Co., Ltd., Gyeongju, Korea) and rice nursery soil (Chungnong Co., Ltd., Suncheon, Korea). The wheat plants were then cultivated in a greenhouse (20 to 25°C) for further experiments.

JCK-7385 SC containing 500 μg/mL Tween 20 was applied twice via foliar spray at booting and heading stages, with a 1-week interval (2WBI and 1WBI). Distilled water containing 500 μg/mL Tween 20 served as a negative control. The synthetic fungicide, Peulrei was applied at a 2,000-fold dilution as the positive control, treated 1DBI. Additionally, three combination treatments of JCK-7385 SC and Peulrei were tested: 2WBI + 1WBI/1DBI; 2WBI/1DBI; and 1WBI/1DBI.

The pathogen F. graminearum strain Z-3639 was cultured on PDA at 25°C for 4–5 days. Agar plugs containing actively growing mycelia were then transferred to CMC broth and incubated at 25°C under light conditions with shaking at 150 rpm for 7 days (Cappellini and Peterson, 1965). After incubation, the mycelium and agar plugs were filtered out with 4 layers of Miracloth. The resulting spore suspension was quantified using a hemocytometer under a microscope. The density of the spore suspension was adjusted to 5.0 × 105 spores/mL, and Tween 20 was added to a final concentration of 500 μg/mL.

Inoculation was conducted via pipetting 10 μL of the spore suspension onto the middle spikelet of each wheat spike (Feng et al., 2018). Disease severity was visually evaluated 7–14 days post-inoculation on a scale of 0–100%. The experiment was conducted in triplicate, with each replicate consisting of six heads. Disease severity, disease incidence, FHB index, and the control value of the FHB index were calculated as previously described in the rice experiment.

Disease control efficacy of JCK-7385 against FHB in rice field

The control efficacy of JCK-7385 SC against rice FHB was evaluated in a field experimental located at Chonnam National University, Gwangju, South Korea. The experiment was arranged in a randomized complete block design with triplicate plots (1 m × 1 m) separated by 1 m. Each block contained 90 spikes, with 30 spikes per replicate.

F. asiaticum 031 was prepared and inoculated into treated plants following the procedure described in the greenhouse experiments. Disease severity and incidence were evaluated three times at 2-week intervals, beginning 2 weeks after inoculation (WAI). Disease severity, disease incidence, FHB index, and the control value of the FHB index were calculated as previously described in the rice greenhouse experiments.

In 2023, a single treatment was applied for FHB control. JCK-7385 SC was diluted 1,000- and 2,000-fold with water, and Tween 20 was added at a concentration of 500 μg/mL. Each sample (2 L) was applied as a foliar spray 2WBI at the booting stage and 1WBI at the heading stage. Distilled water containing 500 μg/mL Tween 20 served as the negative control, while a chemical fungicide (Peulrei) served as the positive control, applied 1DBI of the pathogen.

In 2024, two approaches were tested for FHB control: a single treatment with JCK-7385 SC (2,000-fold dilution) and an integrated treatment combining JCK-7385 SC (2,000-fold dilution) with the chemical fungicide (Peulrei). The JCK-7385 SC sample was prepared following the same method as in the previous year. The single JCK-7385 SC treatment (2 L) was applied as a foliar spray 2WBI at the booting stage and 1WBI at the heading stage. The integrated treatment was applied separately at 2WBI with JCK-7385 SC and 1DBI with Peulrei. Distilled water containing 500 μg/mL Tween 20 served as the negative control, while a synthetic fungicide (Peulrei) served as the positive control, applied 1DBI of the pathogen.

Statistical analysis

All statistical data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation of replicates and analyzed using SPSS software (version 21.0, IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Statistical differences were assessed using one-way ANOVA followed by Duncan’s multiple range test (P < 0.05).

Results

JCK-7385 strain selection

A dual culture bioassay was conducted to evaluate the mycelial growth inhibition of JCK-7385 against F. graminearum and F. asiaticum pathogens. However, no direct antifungal activity was observed against either pathogen (Supplementary Fig. 1A). Therefore, the CB of strain JCK-7385 was employed to investigate its ability to induce expression of the defense-related gene PR1 in transgenic A. thaliana plants using the GUS reporter assay. The results showed that JCK-7385 CB treatments triggered GUS expression, characterized by blue fluorescence along the leaf veins in the treated plants (Supplementary Fig. 1B). Moreover, the JCK-7385 strain also effectively controlled the development of FHB in rice in a screening experiment using inducing-resistance strains under greenhouse conditions (data not shown). According to these results, the JCK-7385 strain was selected to be a candidate for further experiments in this study.

Identification of the JCK-7385 strain

Supplementary Fig. 2 shows the JCK-7385 activated morphology strain on TSA agar. JCK-7385 strain identification was conducted as described previously (Nguyen et al., 2021). JCK-7385 strain was taxonomically characterized using 16S rRNA gene sequencing (Genbank accession no. PQ621117) and concatenated sequence analysis of four housekeeping genes, atpD (PQ618555), trpB (PQ650606), recA (PQ650607), ropB (PQ650608). The 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis showed that strain JCK-7385 had the highest similarity to S. showdoensis ISP 5504, S. viridobrunneus LMG 20317.1, and S. cinereoruber subsp. cinereoruber JCM 4205 (Fig. 1A). However, multilocus sequence analysis phylogeny based on housekeeping genes revealed a different topology to the 16S rRNA gene counterpart, wherein strain JCK-7385 formed S. vietnamensis GIM4.001 with 94% bootstrap value (Fig. 1B). Consequently, it could be confirmed that the JCK-7385 strain belongs to the genus Streptomyces.

Fig. 1

Neighbour-joining phylogenetic tree of JCK-7385 based on the 16S rRNA gene sequence (A), multilocus sequence analysis phylogeny (B) from four loci housekeeping genes (atpD, recA, trpB, and rpoB).

Biochemical characterization of JCK-7385

Plant growth-promoting functions of JCK-7385

Strain JCK-7385 was found to produce IAA, as indicated by the color change of its filtrate to pink, whereas the untreated control retained the original medium color (Supplementary Fig. 3A). According to the experiment results, JCK-7385 also produced siderophore on CAS agar. The halo zone increased owing to the treatment sample size of 14.1, 19.3, and 21.4 mm for 20, 40, and 60 μL, respectively (Supplementary Fig. 3B). Additionally, ACC deaminase activity was confirmed via the JCK-7385 strain on DF agar medium (Supplementary Fig. 3C).

Extracellular enzyme activity

JCK-7385 also exhibited extracellular enzyme activities, including chitinase, cellulase, and gelatinase. Consequently, quantitative analysis showed that the clear zone diameters increased between 3 and 7 days of incubation. After 7 days with a 60 μL sample, the parameters for chitinase, cellulase, and gelatinase were 23.88, 24.76, and 14.47 mm, respectively (Supplementary Fig. 4).

PR1 gene expression by β-glucuronidase assay

All JCK-7385 treatments including CB, CF, cell suspension, SC, and WP induced GUS expression with blue fluorescence along the leaf veins in Arabidopsis thaliana. The intensity was slightly weaker than that in the SA control sample. Conversely, no fluorescence was detected in the untreated plant (Fig. 2). Therefore, JCK-7385 treatments can induce PR1 expression, serving as a marker of SAR pathway activation in A. thaliana.

Fig. 2

GUS expression in Arabidopsis seedlings induced via JCK-7385 treatments. GUS, β-glucuronidase; CB, culture broth of JCK-7385; CF, culture filtrate of JCK-7385; Cell, cell suspension of JCK-7385; SC, suspension concentrate formulation of JCK-7385; WP, wettable powder formulation of JCK-7385; SA, salicylic acid; TSB, tryptic soy broth medium.

Disease control efficacy of JCK-7385 against FHB in rice under greenhouse conditions

Single treatment application

Experimental results demonstrated that the JCK-7385 samples inhibited FHB development in rice. FHB control efficacy was higher in the treatment at a 2,000-fold dilution for JCK-7385 CB, CF, and cell suspension by 35.01%, 31.75% and 42.43%, respectively (Fig. 3, Supplementary Table 2).

Fig. 3

Disease control efficacy of JCK-7385 against FHB in rice under greenhouse conditions. (A) Mean percentage control values of JCK-7385 treatments and Peulrei at 7DAI. (B) Symptoms of FHB in rice. FHB, Fusarium head blight; DAI, days after inoculation; CB, culture broth of JCK-7385; CF, culture filtrate of JCK-7385; Cell, cell suspension of JCK-7385. Each value represents the mean ± standard deviation from 3 pots with 6 grains per pot. Different lower-case letters indicate values that are not significantly different from one another at P < 0.05, according to Duncan’s test.

Conversely, SC and WP formulations at 1,000- and 2,000-fold dilutions were tested to assess the disease control activity in rice under greenhouse conditions. The results showed that the JCK-7385 SC at 2,000-fold dilution most effectively reduced FHB development by 52.5%, followed by the positive control (42.08%) and JCK-7385 WP at 2,000-fold dilution treatment (38.25%) (Fig. 4, Supplementary Table 3).

Fig. 4

Disease control efficacy of JCK-7385 type formulations against FHB in rice under greenhouse conditions. (A) Mean percentage control value of JCK-7385 treatments and Peulrei at 7DAI. (B) Symptoms of FHB in rice. FHB, Fusarium head blight; DAI, days after inoculation; SC, suspension concentrate formulation of JCK-7385; WP, wettable powder formulation of JCK-7385. Each value represents the mean ± standard deviation from 3 pots with 6 grains per pot. Different lower-case letters indicate values that are not significantly different from one another at P < 0.05, according to Duncan’s test.

JCK-7385 SC shelf-life

To investigate the stability and effectiveness of JCK-7385 SC, samples stored at 45°C for 0–18 weeks were tested for FHB control in rice. The experiment results demonstrated that the sample stored for 6 weeks showed the highest efficacy, reducing FHB development by 54.4%. The following values were observed on positive treatment, 9-, 0-, and 12-week stored samples, ranging from 45–52% for FHB control. Moreover, the control efficacy declined rapidly in the 15- and 18-week samples, reaching only approximately 40% (Fig. 5, Supplementary Table 4).

Fig. 5

Disease control efficacy of JCK-7385 SC shelf-life against FHB in rice under greenhouse conditions. (A) Mean percentage control value of JCK-7385 SC treatments and Peulrei at 7DAI. (B) Symptoms of FHB in rice. FHB, Fusarium head blight; DAI, days after inoculation; SC, suspension concentrate formulation of JCK-7385; W, week of storage. Each value represents the mean ± standard deviation from 3 pots with 6 grains per pot. Different lower-case letters indicate values that are not significantly different from others at P < 0.05, according to Duncan’s test.

Integrated treatment application

The integrated treatment combining JCK-7385 SC with the chemical fungicide (Peulrei) showed significantly higher effectiveness in FHB control than that in single treatments (JCK-7385 SC or Peulrei only). The control efficacies were specifically 62.29%, 62.26%, and 57.86% for the 2WBI/1DBI; 2WBI, 1WBI/1DBI; and 1WBI/1DBI treatment, respectively. Moreover, the control efficacy of single treatments was approximately 45% in FHB management (Fig. 6, Supplementary Table 5).

Fig. 6

Disease control efficacy of integrated treatment against FHB in rice under greenhouse conditions. (A) Mean percentage control value of the treatments and Peulrei at 7DAI. (B) Symptoms of FHB in rice. FHB, Fusarium head blight; DAI, days after inoculation; WBI, week before inoculation; DBI, day before inoculation. Each value represents the mean ± standard deviation from 3 pots with 6 grains per pot. Different lower-case letters indicate values that are not significantly different from others at P < 0.05, according to Duncan’s test.

Disease control efficacy of JCK-7385 against FHB in wheat under greenhouse conditions

The JCK-7385 SC was further evaluated for its efficacy against FHB in wheat caused by F. graminearum Z-3639 under greenhouse conditions. A single application at a 2,000-fold dilution reduced disease severity by 47.04%, comparable to the positive control (Peulrei, 49.82%). In addition, the combined application of JCK-7385 SC (2,000-fold dilution) with Peulrei achieved significantly higher inhibition on the disease development, ranging from 66.5–71.6% (Fig. 7, Supplementary Table 6).

Fig. 7

Disease control efficacy of JCK-7385 treatments against FHB in wheat under greenhouse conditions. (A) Mean percentage control value of the treatments and Peulrei at 12DAI. (B) Symptoms of FHB in wheat. FHB, Fusarium head blight; DAI, days after inoculation; WBI, week before inoculation; DBI, day before inoculation; SC, suspension concentrate formulation of JCK-7385. Each value represents the mean ± standard deviation from 3 pots with 6 grains per pot. Different lower-case letters indicate values that are not significantly different from others at P < 0.05, according to Duncan’s test.

Disease control efficacy of JCK-7385 against FHB in rice field

In 2023, based on greenhouse experiment results, JCK-7385 SC was tested under rice field conditions at 1,000- and 2,000-fold dilutions. The 2,000-fold dilution also showed a higher FHB disease control efficacy than the 1,000-fold dilution and positive control (Peulrei) treatments. The 2,000-fold dilution treatment showed control values of 45.0%, 40.3%, and 40.1% at 2WAI, 4WAI, and 6WAI, respectively. Additionally, the 1,000-fold dilution yielded 28.7%, 15.9%, and 23.2% (2WAI, 4WAI, and 6WAI, respectively) while the control values of the Peulrei sample were 42.4%, 36.6%, and 38.8% (Fig. 8, Supplementary Table 7).

Fig. 8

Disease control efficacy of JCK-7385 SC against FHB in rice field in 2023. (A) Mean percentage control value of the treatments. (B) Symptoms of FHB in rice. FHB, Fusarium head blight; WBI, week before inoculation; DBI, day before inoculation; WAI, week after inoculation; SC, suspension concentrate formulation of JCK-7385. Each value represents the mean ± standard deviation from 3 blocks with 30 grains per block. Different lower-case letters indicate values that are not significantly different from others at P < 0.05, according to Duncan’s test.

In 2024, the integrated treatment of JCK-7385 SC at a 2,000-fold dilution with Peulrei achieved the highest control efficacy against FHB than that of other treatments. The control values were 65.1%, 53.8%, and 52.0% for 2WAI, 4WAI, and 6WAI, respectively. Conversely, single treatments maintained control values of approximately 45% at 6WAI (Fig. 9, Supplementary Table 8).

Fig. 9

Disease control efficacy of JCK-7385 treatments against FHB in the rice field in 2024. (A) Mean percentage control value of the treatments. (B) Symptoms of FHB in rice. FHB, Fusarium head blight; SC, suspension concentrate formulation of JCK-7385; WBI, week before inoculation; DBI, day before inoculation; WAI, week after inoculation. Each value represents the mean ± standard deviation from 3 blocks with 30 grains per block. Different lower-case letters indicate values that are not significantly different from others at P < 0.05, according to Duncan’s test.

Discussion

Fusarium asiaticum is predominantly found in rice, barley, and wheat, exhibiting FHB symptoms with a prevalence of 95% in Korea (Jang et al., 2019). The Fusarium graminearum species complex is frequently associated with severe FHB epidemics in many regions. Globally, FHB is regarded as the most devastating fungal disease of wheat worldwide, causing significant grain yield and quality loss, reduced harvest and marketability, as well as accumulating trichothecene mycotoxins (Xu et al., 2022). Therefore, F. asiaticum and F. graminearum were selected for the in vivo assays to evaluate FHB in rice and wheat, respectively. While many studies globally have examined the use of Streptomyces species as a biocontrol agent against FHB in wheat, comparable research in rice remains limited. To our knowledge, this is the first report demonstrating the successful control of FHB in rice using a Streptomyces sp. strain.

In this study, unlike many Streptomyces strains with antifungal activity, JCK-7385 did not inhibit F. graminearum and F. asiaticum pathogen development on PDA agar dual-culture plates (Supplementary Fig. 1A). Therefore, following Park et al. (2020), transgenic Arabidopsis plants carrying the PR1 promoter fused to β-GUS serve as a model for a system to screen bacterial inducers that enhance disease resistance mechanisms in various plant species. The experiment result showed that JCK-7385 CB treatments induced GUS expression, visible as blue fluorescence along the leaf veins in Arabidopsis thaliana leaves (Supplementary Fig. 1B), suggesting activation of the SA-dependent SAR pathway, consistent with previous findings (Ali et al., 2018; Molinari et al., 2014).

The JCK-7385 strain was identified as Streptomyces sp. based on the phylogenetic analysis of the 16S rRNA and four housekeeping gene sequences (Fig. 1). It exhibited plant growth-promoting traits, including IAA and ACC deaminase production (Supplementary Fig. 3A and C). Igarashi et al. (2002) demonstrate that these metabolites are essential for the growth-enhancing properties of Streptomyces spp. IAA is considered a key determinant of root development, promoting cell elongation and division (Nascimento et al., 2020). ACC deaminase degrades ACC, the immediate precursor of ethylene, thereby inhibiting ethylene biosynthesis and enhancing plant tolerance to unfavorable conditions. The JCK-7385 strain also showed siderophore production on the CAS agar plate (Supplementary Fig. 3B). The siderophore compounds facilitate plant nutrient uptake, providing a direct mechanism for promoting plant growth. Moreover, they contribute to plant defense by competing with pathogens for iron (Chen et al., 2021a; Etesami and Maheshwari, 2018). Conversely, the JCK-7385 strain produced extracellular enzymes, including chitinase, cellulase, and gelatinase (Supplementary Fig. 4). These enzymes are involved in plant defense mechanisms, enhancing activity and responsiveness to pathogens, indicating the potential to suppress plant diseases (Kumar et al., 2018a; Saberi Riseh et al., 2024; Shimoi et al., 2010).

Experiment results showed that JCK-7385 treatments induced the PR1 expression in transgenic Arabidopsis plants. The CB, CF, and cell suspension of JCK-7385 at a low concentration (2,000-fold dilution) showed a positive response in the GUS bioassay (Fig. 2). Moreover, these treatments also inhibited FHB development in rice under greenhouse conditions (Figs. 3 and 4, Supplementary Tables 2 and 3). These findings indicate that JCK-7385 controls FHB in rice primarily via an induced resistance mechanism. Therefore, further research is needed to identify the plant-inducing compounds from JCK-7385 samples, especially in the cells of the JCK-7385 strain.

Formulations of BCAs enhance product management and application, via preserving the organisms during manufacturing, transportation, and storage, protecting them from environmental stress, and enhancing their activity. The primary goals of formulation include stabilizing the active ingredient, facilitating ease of use, and minimizing applicator exposure risks (Leggett et al., 2011). SC is a liquid formulation containing solid particles suspended in a liquid medium, offering stability and ease of application (Copping and Menn, 2000). In this study, the SC formulation was prepared, including several beneficial ingredients. Specifically, propylene glycol served as a solvent, emulsifier, and humectant, aiding in the distribution and stabilization of active ingredients while enhancing the ability of the product to spread and absorb (Gupta et al., 2024). Xanthan gum is commonly used in pesticide formulations for various purposes, such as enhancing spray characteristics and enhancing pesticide effectiveness (Zhang and Liu, 2011). Conversely, sodium benzoate functions primarily as a preservative, preventing microbial growth in the pesticide formulation and ensuring its stability and shelf life (Johnston et al., 2008). The JCK-7385 SC sample showed stable efficacy in controlling FHB in rice, as confirmed via the SC shelf-life experiment. Therefore, the JCK-7385 SC sample should be used within 2 years to ensure optimal efficacy (Fig. 5, Supplementary Table 4). According to Australian Agvet Chemical Regulator, samples that demonstrate sufficient stability at temperatures ranging from 40°C to 54°C are expected to remain stable for at least 2 years under standard storage conditions (Australian Agvet Chemical Regulator, 2020).

FHB is a devastating disease in cereal crops, leading to significant yield losses and mycotoxin contamination in grains. The absence of effective biorational control strategies renders sporadic FHB outbreaks a significant risk to global food security and safety. To reduce crop failure and yield loss associated with this destructive fungal disease, integrated management strategies leveraging existing knowledge are essential (Chen et al., 2022). Importantly, the integrated treatment of JCK-7385 SC and a chemical fungicide (Peulrei) achieved significantly higher FHB control efficacy than single treatments under greenhouse and field conditions in this study (Figs. 6, 7, and 9, Supplementary Tables 5, 6, and 8). Many studies demonstrate the significant effectiveness of combining biological and chemical agents in enhancing plant disease control and represent an effective method in sustainable agriculture, thereby reducing the reliance on chemical pesticides (Di Francesco and Mari, 2014; Duraisamy et al., 2022; Omar et al., 2006; Ons et al., 2020). Taken together, previous reports have shown the disease control efficacy of Streptomyces sp. isolated from rice against Fusarium species and others through its indirect, direct mechanisms, and plant growth-promoting abilities (Awla et al., 2017; Chaiharn et al., 2020; Jung et al., 2013; Yang et al., 2024). Therefore, future research should focus on detecting the JCK-7385 second metabolites to determine the action mechanism and apply it to other plant diseases.

In summary, the Streptomyces sp. JCK-7385 strain exhibited plant growth-promoting activity and produced extracellular enzymes in an in vitro bioassay. JCK-7385 treatments also induced expression of the defense-related marker gene PR1 in transgenic Arabidopsis (GUS assay) and, at low concentrations, inhibited FHB development in vivo, suggesting that its activity may involve an induced resistance mechanism. In future research, it will be essential to isolate and identify the metabolites of the JCK-7385 strain that induce the plant resistance pathway. Additionally, JCK-7385 SC treatment exhibited significant control efficacy against FHB under greenhouse and field conditions. Moreover, the integrated treatment of JCK-7385 SC with the chemical fungicide (Peulrei) effectively controlled FHB development, outperforming either application alone. To our knowledge, this is the first report of FHB control in rice using a Streptomyces strain. These findings indicate that the JCK-7385 strain can be developed as a biological fungicide.

Notes

Conflicts of Interest

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Acknowledgments

This research was financially supported by the “Regional Innovation System & Education (RISE)” through the Gwangju RISE Center, funded by the Ministry of Education (MOE) and the Gwangju Metropolitan Government, Republic of Korea (2025-RISE-05-011).

References

Abbasi S., Safaie N., Sadeghi A., Shamsbakhsh M.. 2019;Streptomyces strains induce resistance to Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici Race 3 in tomato through different molecular mechanisms. Front. Microbiol 10:1505.
Ali S., Mir Z. A., Bhat J. A., Tyagi A., Chandrashekar N., Yadav P., Rawat S., Sultana M., Grover A.. 2018;Isolation and characterization of systemic acquired resistance marker gene PR1 and its promoter from Brassica juncea. 3 Biotech 8:10.
Alisaac E., Mahlein A.-K.. 2023;Fusarium head blight on wheat: biology, modern detection and diagnosis and integrated disease management. Toxins 15:192.
Anderson N. R., Freije A. N., Bergstrom G. C., Bradley C. A., Cowger C., Faske T., Hollier C., Kleczewski N., Padgett G. B., Paul P., Price T., Wise K. A.. 2020;Sensitivity of Fusarium graminearum to metconazole and tebuconazole fungicides before and after widespread use in wheat in the United States. Plant Health Prog 21:85–90.
Asibi A. E., Chai Q., Coulter J. A.. 2019;Rice blast: a disease with implications for global food security. Agronomy 9:451.
Australian Agvet Chemical Regulator. 2020. Generation of storage stability data for agricultural chemical products URL https://www.apvma.gov.au/registrations-and-permits/data-requirements/agricultural-data-guidelines/chemistry-manufacture-part-2/storage-stability. 24 February 2020.
Awla H. K., Kadir J., Othman R., Rashid T. S., Hamid S., Wong M.-Y.. 2017;Plant growth-promoting abilities and biocontrol efficacy of Streptomyces sp. UPMRS4 against Pyricularia oryzae. Biol. Control 112:55–63.
Bottalico A., Perrone G.. 2002;Toxigenic Fusarium species and mycotoxins associated with head blight in small-grain cereals in Europe. Eur. J. Plant Pathol 108:611–624.
Cappellini R. A., Peterson J. L.. 1965;Macroconidium formation in submerged cultures by a nonsporulating strain of Gibberella zeae. Mycologia 57:962–966.
Chaiharn M., Theantana T., Pathom-Aree W.. 2020;Evaluation of biocontrol activities of Streptomyces spp. against rice blast disease fungi. Pathogens 9:126.
Chen A.-H., Islam T., Ma Z.-H.. 2022;An integrated pest management program for managing Fusarium head blight disease in cereals. J. Integr. Agric 21:3434–3444.
Chen J., Hu L., Chen N., Jia R., Ma Q., Wang Y.. 2021a;The biocontrol and plant growth-promoting properties of Streptomyces alfalfae XN-04 revealed by functional and genomic analysis. Front. Microbiol 12:745766.
Chen J., Wei J., Fu L., Wang S., Liu J., Guo Q., Jiang J., Tian Y., Che Z., Chen G., Liu S.. 2021b;Tebuconazole resistance of Fusarium graminearum field populations from wheat in Henan Province. J. Phytopathol 169:525–532.
Colombo E. M., Kunova A., Pizzatti C., Saracchi M., Cortesi P., Pasquali M.. 2019;Selection of an endophytic Streptomyces sp. strain DEF09 from wheat roots as a biocontrol agent against Fusarium graminearum. Front. Microbiol 10:2356.
Copping L. G., Menn J. J.. 2000;Biopesticides: a review of their action, applications and efficacy. Pest Manag. Sci 56:651–676.
De Oliveira-Longatti S. M., Marra L. M., Lima Soares B., Bomfeti C. A., da Silva K., Avelar Ferreira P. A. A., de Souza Moreira F. M.. 2014;Bacteria isolated from soils of the western Amazon and from rehabilitated bauxite-mining areas have potential as plant growth promoters. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol 30:1239–1250.
De Troyer L., Audenaert K., Ommeslag S., Debode J., De Gelder L., De Zutter N.. 2025;The biocontrol agent Streptomyces rimosus subsp. rimosus tempers shifts in the wheat spicosphere microbiome induced by Fusarium head blight. Front. Plant Sci 16:1540242.
Di Francesco A., Mari M.. 2014;Use of biocontrol agents in combination with physical and chemical treatments: efficacy assessment. Stewart Postharvest Rev 1:2.
Dill-Macky R., Jones R. K.. 2000;The effect of previous crop residues and tillage on Fusarium head blight of wheat. Plant Dis 84:71–76.
Duraisamy K., Ha A., Kim J., Park A. R., Kim B., Song C. W., Song H., Kim J.-C.. 2022;Enhancement of disease control efficacy of chemical fungicides combined with plant resistance inducer 2,3-butanediol against turfgrass fungal diseases. Plant Pathol. J 38:182–193.
Dweba C. C., Figlan S., Shimelis H. A., Motaung T. E., Sydenham S., Mwadzingeni L., Tsilo T. J.. 2017;Fusarium head blight of wheat: pathogenesis and control strategies. Crop Prot 91:114–122.
Etesami H., Maheshwari D. K.. 2018;Use of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPRs) with multiple plant growth promoting traits in stress agriculture: action mechanisms and future prospects. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf 156:225–246.
Feng C., Liu H., Tang Z.. 2018;Fusarium graminearum inoculation on wheat head. Bio Protoc 8:e2964.
Figueroa M., Hammond-Kosack K. E., Solomon P. S.. 2018;A review of wheat diseases: a field perspective. Mol. Plant Pathol 19:1523–1536.
Gopalakrishnan S., Srinivas V., Prasanna S. L.. 2020. Streptomyces. Beneficial microbes in agro-ecology: bacteria and fungi In : Amaresan N., Senthil Kumar M., Annapurna K., Kumar K., Sankaranarayanan A., eds. p. 55–71. Elsevier. London, UK:
Goswami R. S., Kistler H. C.. 2005;Pathogenicity and in planta mycotoxin accumulation among members of the Fusarium graminearum species complex on wheat and rice. Phytopathology 95:1397–1404.
Guo Y., Zheng W., Rong X., Huang Y.. 2008;A multilocus phylogeny of the Streptomyces griseus 16S rRNA gene clade: use of multilocus sequence analysis for streptomycete systematics. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol 58:149–159.
Gupta R., Malik P., Rani R., Solanki R., Ameta R. K., Malik V., Mukherjee T. K.. 2024;Recent progress on nanoemulsions mediated pesticides delivery: insights for agricultural sustainability. Plant Nano Biol 8:100073.
Hazra D. K., Purkait A.. 2019;Role of pesticide formulations for sustainable crop protection and environment management: a review. J. Pharmacogn. Phytochem 8:686–693.
Hsu S. C., Lockwood J. L.. 1975;Powdered chitin agar as a selective medium for enumeration of actinomycetes in water and soil. Appl. Microbiol 29:422–426.
Igarashi Y., Iida T., Yoshida R., Furumai T.. 2002;Pteridic acids A and B, novel plant growth promoters with auxin-like activity from Streptomyces hygroscopicus TP-A0451. J. Antibiot 55:764–767.
Jang J. Y., Baek S. G., Choi J.-H., Kim S., Kim J., Kim D.-W., Yun S.-H., Lee T.. 2019;Characterization of nivalenol-producing Fusarium asiaticum that causes cereal head blight in Korea. Plant Pathol. J 35:543–552.
Jia H., Zhou J., Xue S., Li G., Yan H., Ran C., Zhang Y., Shi J., Jia L., Wang X., Luo J., Ma Z.. 2018;A journey to understand wheat Fusarium head blight resistance in the Chinese wheat landrace Wangshuibai. Crop J 6:48–59.
Johnston J. J., Bunning R., Taylor N., Griffin D.. 2008. Benzoate adjuvant to increase the utility of methylxanthine pesticides: identification of a potential rodenticide formulation for organic food production. Proceedings of the 23rd Vertebrate Pest Conference In : Timm R. M., Madon M. B., eds. p. 166–169. University of California. Davis, CA, USA:
Jouany J. P.. 2007;Methods for preventing, decontaminating and minimizing the toxicity of mycotoxins in feeds. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol 137:342–362.
Jung B., Park S.-Y., Lee Y.-W., Lee J.. 2013;Biological efficacy of Streptomyces sp. strain BN1 against the cereal head blight pathogen Fusarium graminearum. Plant Pathol. J 29:52–58.
Kamle M., Borah R., Bora H., Jaiswal A. K., Singh R. K., Kumar P.. 2020. Systemic acquired resistance (SAR) and induced systemic resistance (ISR): role and mechanism of action against phytopathogens. Fungal biotechnology and bioengineering In : Hesham AE-L, Upadhyay R. S., Sharma G. D., Manoharachary C., Gupta V. K., eds. p. 457–470. Springer International Publishing. Cham, Switzerland:
Kim Y. T., Lee Y.-R., Jin J., Han K.-H., Kim H., Kim J.-C., Lee T., Yun S.-H., Lee Y.-W.. 2005;Two different polyketide synthase genes are required for synthesis of zearalenone in Gibberella zeae. Mol. Microbiol 58:1102–1113.
Knoester M., Pieterse C. M. J., Bol J. F., Van Loon L. C.. 1999;Systemic resistance in Arabidopsis induced by rhizobacteria requires ethylene-dependent signaling at the site of application. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact 12:720–727.
Kondo Y., Ito T., Nakagami H., Hirakawa Y., Saito M., Tamaki T., Shirasu K., Fukuda H.. 2014;Plant GSK3 proteins regulate xylem cell differentiation downstream of TDIF–TDR signalling. Nat. Commun 5:3504.
Kumar M., Brar A., Yadav M., Chawade A., Vivekanand V., Pareek N.. 2018a;Chitinases: potential candidates for enhanced plant resistance towards fungal pathogens. Agriculture 8:88.
Kumar S., Stecher G., Li M., Knyaz C., Tamura K.. 2018b;MEGA X: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis across computing platforms. Mol. Biol. Evol 35:1547–1549.
Le K. D., Kim J., Nguyen H. T., Yu N. H., Park A. R., Lee C. W., Kim J.-C.. 2021;Streptomyces sp. JCK-6131 protects plants against bacterial and fungal diseases via two mechanisms. Front. Plant Sci 12:726266.
Lee S.-H., Lee J., Nam Y. J., Lee S., Ryu J.-G., Lee T.. 2010;Population structure of Fusarium graminearum from maize and rice in 2009 in Korea. Plant Pathol. J 26:321–327.
Leggett M., Leland J., Kellar K., Epp B.. 2011;Formulation of microbial biocontrol agents: an industrial perspective. Can. J. Plant Pathol 33:101–107.
Legrand F., Picot A., Cobo-Díaz J. F., Chen W., Le Floch G.. 2017;Challenges facing the biological control strategies for the management of Fusarium head blight of cereals caused by F. graminearum. Biol. Control 113:26–38.
Li J., Brader G., Palva E. T.. 2004;The WRKY70 transcription factor: a node of convergence for jasmonate-mediated and salicylate-mediated signals in plant defense. Plant Cell 16:319–331.
Louden B. C., Haarmann D., Lynne A. M.. 2011;Use of blue agar CAS assay for siderophore detection. J. Microbiol. Biol. Educ 12:51–53.
McMullen M., Bergstrom G., De Wolf E., Dill-Macky R., Hershman D., Shaner G., Van Sanford D.. 2012;A unified effort to fight an enemy of wheat and barley: Fusarium head blight. Plant Dis 96:1712–1728.
Molinari S., Fanelli E., Leonetti P.. 2014;Expression of tomato salicylic acid (SA)-responsive pathogenesis-related genes in Mi-1-mediated and SA-induced resistance to root-knot nematodes. Mol. Plant Pathol 15:255–264.
Mouloud G., Samir M., Hani B., Daoud H.. 2015;Biocontrol of wheat Fusarium head blight (FHB) by Streptomyces spp. isolated from the rhizosphere of Astragalus gombo Coss. & Dur. and Ononis angustissima Lam. Am.-Euras. J. Agric. Environ. Sci 5:2499–2511.
Nascimento F. X., Hernandez A. G., Glick B. R., Rossi M. J.. 2020;The extreme plant-growth-promoting properties of Pantoea phytobeneficialis MSR2 revealed by functional and genomic analysis. Environ. Microbiol 22:1341–1355.
National Laws of the Republic of Korea. 2023. Determination of shelf life period URL https://psis.rda.go.kr/psis/cont/contentMain.ps?menuId=PS00302. 14 November 2023.
Nguyen H. T. T., Park A. R., Hwang I. M., Kim J.-C.. 2021;Identification and delineation of action mechanism of antifungal agents: reveromycin E and its new derivative isolated from Streptomyces sp. JCK-6141. Postharvest Biol. Technol 182:111700.
Niu D.-D., Wang C.-J., Guo Y.-H., Jiang C.-H., Zhang W.-Z., Wang Y., Guo J.-H.. 2012;The plant growth-promoting rhizobacterium Bacillus cereus AR156 induces resistance in tomato with induction and priming of defence response. Biocontrol Sci. Technol 22:991–1004.
Omar I., O’Neill T. M., Rossall S.. 2006;Biological control of fusarium crown and root rot of tomato with antagonistic bacteria and integrated control when combined with the fungicide carbendazim. Plant Pathol 55:92–99.
Ons L., Bylemans D., Thevissen K., Cammue B. P. A.. 2020;Combining biocontrol agents with chemical fungicides for integrated plant fungal disease control. Microorganisms 8:1930.
Palazzini J. M., Alberione E., Torres A., Donat C., Köhl J., Chulze S.. 2016;Biological control of Fusarium graminearum sensu stricto, causal agent of Fusarium head blight of wheat, using formulated antagonists under field conditions in Argentina. Biol. Control 94:56–61.
Palazzini J. M., Torres A. M., Chulze S. N.. 2013. Biological control of Fusarium head blight of wheat: from selection to formulation. Fusarium head blight in Latin America In : Alconada Magliano T. M., Chulze S. N., eds. p. 191–204. Springer. Netherlands, Dordrecht, Germany:
Park A. R., Jeong S.-I., Jeon H. W., Kim J., Kim N., Ha M. T., Mannaa M., Kim J., Lee C. W., Min B. S., Seo Y.-S., Kim J.-C.. 2020;A diketopiperazine, cyclo-(L-Pro-L-Ile), derived from Bacillus thuringiensis JCK-1233 controls pine wilt disease by elicitation of moderate hypersensitive reaction. Front. Plant Sci 11:1023.
Park K. S., Kloepper J. W.. 2000;Activation of PR-1a promoter by rhizobacteria that induce systemic resistance in tobacco against Pseudomonas syringae pvtabaci. Biol. Control 18:2–9.
Parry D. W., Jenkinson P., McLEOD L.. 1995;Fusarium ear blight (scab) in small grain cereals: a review. Plant Pathol 44:207–238.
Penrose D. M., Glick B. R.. 2003;Methods for isolating and characterizing ACC deaminase-containing plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria. Physiol. Plant 118:10–15.
Pieterse C. M. J., Zamioudis C., Berendsen R. L., Weller D. M., Van Wees S. C. M., Bakker P. A. H. M.n. 2014;Induced systemic resistance by beneficial microbes. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol 52:347–375.
Saberi Riseh R., Vatankhah M., Hassanisaadi M., Barka E. A.. 2024;Unveiling the role of hydrolytic enzymes from soil biocontrol bacteria in sustainable phytopathogen management. Front. Biosci. (Landmark Ed) 29:105.
Saitou N., Nei M.. 1987;The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol. Biol. Evol 4:406–425.
Shah L., Ali A., Yahya M., Zhu Y., Wang S., Si H., Rahman H., Ma C.. 2018;Integrated control of Fusarium head blight and deoxynivalenol mycotoxin in wheat. Plant Pathol 67:532–548.
Shimoi S., Inoue K., Kitagawa H., Yamasaki M., Tsushima S., Park P., Ikeda K.. 2010;Biological control for rice blast disease by employing detachment action with gelatinolytic bacteria. Biol. Control 55:85–91.
Shude S. R. N., Yobo K. S., Mbili N. C.. 2020;Progress in the management of Fusarium head blight of wheat: an overview. S. Afr. J. Sci 116:7854.
Singh A. K., Chhatpar H. S.. 2011;Combined use of Streptomyces sp. A6 and chemical fungicides against fusarium wilt of Cajanus cajan may reduce the dosage of fungicides required in the field. Crop Prot 30:770–775.
Singh P., Singh J., Rajput R. S., Vaishnav A., Ray S., Singh R. K., Singh H. B.. 2019;Exploration of multitrait antagonistic microbes against Fusarium oxysporum f.splycopersici. J. Appl. Nat. Sci 11:503–510.
Starkey D. E., Ward T. J., Aoki T., Gale L. R., Kistler H. C., Geiser D. M., Suga H., Tóth B., Varga J., O’Donnell K.. 2007;Global molecular surveillance reveals novel Fusarium head blight species and trichothecene toxin diversity. Fungal Genet. Biol 44:1191–1204.
Stoltzfus J. R., So R., Malarvithi P. P., Ladha J. K., de Bruijn F. J.. 1997;Isolation of endophytic bacteria from rice and assessment of their potential for supplying rice with biologically fixed nitrogen. Plant Soil 194:25–36.
Strange R. N., Smith H.. 1971;A fungal growth stimulant in anthers which predisposes wheat to attack by Fusarium graminearum. Physiol. Plant Pathol 1:145–150.
Tian X., Hu L., Jia R., Cao S., Sun Y., Dong X., Wang Y.. 2024;Streptomyces pratensis S10 promotes wheat plant growth and induces resistance in wheat seedlings against Fusarium graminearum. J. Fungi 10:578.
Torres A. M., Palacios S. A., Yerkovich N., Palazzini J. M., Battilani P., Leslie J. F., Logrieco A. F., Chulze S. N.. 2019;Fusarium head blight and mycotoxins in wheat: prevention and control strategies across the food chain. World Mycotoxin J 12:333–355.
Trail F., Xu H., Loranger R., Gadoury D.. 2002;Physiological and environmental aspects of ascospore discharge in Gibberella zeae (anamorph Fusarium graminearum). Mycologia 94:181–189.
Wegulo S. N., Baenziger P. S., Hernandez Nopsa J., Bockus W. W., Hallen-Adams H.. 2015;Management of Fusarium head blight of wheat and barley. Crop Prot 73:100–107.
Xu M., Wang Q., Wang G., Zhang X., Liu H., Jiang C.. 2022;Combatting Fusarium head blight: advances in molecular interactions between Fusarium graminearum and wheat. Phytopathol. Res 4:37.
Yang H., Hu Z., Xiao R., Liu Z.-D., Zhang M., Li Y.-L., Wu S.-D., Fu Z.-J.. 2024;Identification and performance of endophytic actinobacteria Ahn65 with functions of growth promotion and disease resistance for rice. Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol 134:102418.
Yeo Y. J., Park A. R., Vuong B. S., Kim J.-C.. 2024;Biocontrol of Fusarium head blight in rice using Bacillus velezensis JCK-7158. Front. Microbiol 15:1358689.
Zhang X., Liu J.. 2011;Effect of arabic gum and xanthan gum on the stability of pesticide in water emulsion. J. Agric. Food Chem 59:1308–1315.
Zhao H., Tao X., Song W., Xu H., Li M., Cai Y., Wang J., Duan Y., Zhou M.. 2022;Mechanism of Fusarium graminearum resistance to ergosterol biosynthesis inhibitors: G443S substitution of the drug target FgCYP51A. J. Agric. Food Chem 70:1788–1798.

Article information Continued

Fig. 1

Neighbour-joining phylogenetic tree of JCK-7385 based on the 16S rRNA gene sequence (A), multilocus sequence analysis phylogeny (B) from four loci housekeeping genes (atpD, recA, trpB, and rpoB).

Fig. 2

GUS expression in Arabidopsis seedlings induced via JCK-7385 treatments. GUS, β-glucuronidase; CB, culture broth of JCK-7385; CF, culture filtrate of JCK-7385; Cell, cell suspension of JCK-7385; SC, suspension concentrate formulation of JCK-7385; WP, wettable powder formulation of JCK-7385; SA, salicylic acid; TSB, tryptic soy broth medium.

Fig. 3

Disease control efficacy of JCK-7385 against FHB in rice under greenhouse conditions. (A) Mean percentage control values of JCK-7385 treatments and Peulrei at 7DAI. (B) Symptoms of FHB in rice. FHB, Fusarium head blight; DAI, days after inoculation; CB, culture broth of JCK-7385; CF, culture filtrate of JCK-7385; Cell, cell suspension of JCK-7385. Each value represents the mean ± standard deviation from 3 pots with 6 grains per pot. Different lower-case letters indicate values that are not significantly different from one another at P < 0.05, according to Duncan’s test.

Fig. 4

Disease control efficacy of JCK-7385 type formulations against FHB in rice under greenhouse conditions. (A) Mean percentage control value of JCK-7385 treatments and Peulrei at 7DAI. (B) Symptoms of FHB in rice. FHB, Fusarium head blight; DAI, days after inoculation; SC, suspension concentrate formulation of JCK-7385; WP, wettable powder formulation of JCK-7385. Each value represents the mean ± standard deviation from 3 pots with 6 grains per pot. Different lower-case letters indicate values that are not significantly different from one another at P < 0.05, according to Duncan’s test.

Fig. 5

Disease control efficacy of JCK-7385 SC shelf-life against FHB in rice under greenhouse conditions. (A) Mean percentage control value of JCK-7385 SC treatments and Peulrei at 7DAI. (B) Symptoms of FHB in rice. FHB, Fusarium head blight; DAI, days after inoculation; SC, suspension concentrate formulation of JCK-7385; W, week of storage. Each value represents the mean ± standard deviation from 3 pots with 6 grains per pot. Different lower-case letters indicate values that are not significantly different from others at P < 0.05, according to Duncan’s test.

Fig. 6

Disease control efficacy of integrated treatment against FHB in rice under greenhouse conditions. (A) Mean percentage control value of the treatments and Peulrei at 7DAI. (B) Symptoms of FHB in rice. FHB, Fusarium head blight; DAI, days after inoculation; WBI, week before inoculation; DBI, day before inoculation. Each value represents the mean ± standard deviation from 3 pots with 6 grains per pot. Different lower-case letters indicate values that are not significantly different from others at P < 0.05, according to Duncan’s test.

Fig. 7

Disease control efficacy of JCK-7385 treatments against FHB in wheat under greenhouse conditions. (A) Mean percentage control value of the treatments and Peulrei at 12DAI. (B) Symptoms of FHB in wheat. FHB, Fusarium head blight; DAI, days after inoculation; WBI, week before inoculation; DBI, day before inoculation; SC, suspension concentrate formulation of JCK-7385. Each value represents the mean ± standard deviation from 3 pots with 6 grains per pot. Different lower-case letters indicate values that are not significantly different from others at P < 0.05, according to Duncan’s test.

Fig. 8

Disease control efficacy of JCK-7385 SC against FHB in rice field in 2023. (A) Mean percentage control value of the treatments. (B) Symptoms of FHB in rice. FHB, Fusarium head blight; WBI, week before inoculation; DBI, day before inoculation; WAI, week after inoculation; SC, suspension concentrate formulation of JCK-7385. Each value represents the mean ± standard deviation from 3 blocks with 30 grains per block. Different lower-case letters indicate values that are not significantly different from others at P < 0.05, according to Duncan’s test.

Fig. 9

Disease control efficacy of JCK-7385 treatments against FHB in the rice field in 2024. (A) Mean percentage control value of the treatments. (B) Symptoms of FHB in rice. FHB, Fusarium head blight; SC, suspension concentrate formulation of JCK-7385; WBI, week before inoculation; DBI, day before inoculation; WAI, week after inoculation. Each value represents the mean ± standard deviation from 3 blocks with 30 grains per block. Different lower-case letters indicate values that are not significantly different from others at P < 0.05, according to Duncan’s test.