Triazole Fungicides Sensitivity of Sclerotinia homoeocarpa in Korean Golf Courses

Article information

Abstract

Introduction

Dollar spot, caused by Sclerotinia homoeocarpa, is a common and persistent disease of cool-and warm-season turfgrass species occurring in golf courses in South Korea, North America, Europe, Japan and elsewhere. Chemical preventive measures employing fungicides are in use for the prevention of dollar spot. Nevertheless, due to repetitive usage of these fungicides, the manifestation of fungicide resistant strains is increasingly reported. Appearance of resistant isolates to the fungicides containing heavy metal additives was reported as early as in the late 1960s (Cole et al., 1968; Massie et al., 1968). Benzimidazole fungicides experienced numerous reports of occurrences of resistant isolates in the early 1970s soon after its registration (Burpee, 1997; Detweiler et al., 1983; Warren et al., 1974). Among the translocating fungicide, a dicarboxamide fungicide was reported in 1980s (Detweiler et al., 1983), and a demethylation inhibitor (DMI) fungicide was too highlighted in 1990s that the appearance of resistant isolates was occurred (Vargas et al., 1992). Since the first report of the resistant isolates of DMI fungicides on a dollar spot was filed by Vargas et al. (1992), a lot of research reports on the resistance of DMI fungicides in many countries such as the United States, Europe, and Canada (Burpee, 1997; Golembiewski et al., 1995; Hsiang et al., 2007; Jo et al., 2006; Miller et al., 2002; Mocioni et al., 2001; Ok et al., 2011; Popko et al., 2012) have been published. In South Korea, appearance of resistance to propiconazole has been reported (Shim et al., 2001).

Same class of fungicides usually show cross-resistance, but cases of not exhibiting cross-resistance or showing weak correlations have been reported for DMI fungicides (Hsiang et al., 1997; Leroux, 1992; Miller et al., 2002; Robbertse et al., 2001). The maiden attempt to study the cross-resistance to DMI on grass dollar spot was by Doney and Vinceli (1993), and research reports on cross-resistance of triazole fungicides has been well documented (Golembiewski et al., 1995; Hsiang et al., 1997; Miller et al., 2002; Ok et al., 2011).

The aims of the present research were to (i) identify modified sensitivity of S. hoemoeocarpa isolates in golf courses treated with triazole fungicides and (ii) investigate the cross-resistance of S. hoemoeocarpa isolates towards three triazole fungicides i.e., hexaconazole, propiconazole and tebuconazole, which are typically used for the prevention of dollar spot in the fields.

Materials and Methods

Collection and isolation of S. homoeocarpa

S. homoeocarpa isolates were collected from golf courses green, tee and fairway exhibiting dollar spots across ten golf courses in South Korea. Isolation was made by collecting hole-cup sized cylindrical turfgrass patches taken from ten golf courses in Korea. Two hundred and sixty-five isolates of S. homoeocarpa were collected from four different species of turfgrasses: 161 isolates from creeping bentgrass, 67 isolates from Kentucky bluegrass, 21 isolates from perennial ryegrass and 16 isolates from zoysiagrass (Table 1). The isolates were sampled in spring and fall of 2014 and 2015. Of the 265 isolates, sixty strains of S. homoeocarpa were chosen for use in the study by selecting only one strain per diseased patch in the sample and additional six strains were obtained from the Korea Turfgrass Research Institute (KTRI) (Table 2).

Table 1

Collection sites, Host plants, and the number of Sclerotinia homoeocarpa isolates

Table 2

The date of isolation, collected golf courses, history of triazole fungicides use, host, and the number of isolates of Sclerotinia homoeocarpa used in this study

Each isolate was picked up from the margins of the infection center on symptomatic leaf blades as described by Jo et al. (2006). Individual leaf blades infected within the dollar spot showing distinctive brown edge at the rim were surface disinfected in 75% EtOH and 1% sodium hypochlorite solution, and rinsed three times using sterilized water. The disinfected leaf blades were dried on a sterilized filter paper prior to inoculation of the fungi on water agar (WA) and stored at 25°C for 48 h under cycles of 12 h light/12 h darkness.

Mycelium formed from the section was isolated and transferred to potato dextrose agar (PDA; Difco, USA). After 7 days of inoculation on PDA, S. homoeocarpa isolates were identified based on morphological features and by comparison to reference isolates. Pure cultures of S. homoeocarpa were obtained by subculturing hyphae from the edge of an actively growing colony and subsequently transferred to PDA plates.

Results

Isolate sensitivity to triazole fungicides

Sensitive and resistant isolates were not clearly distinguished and showed quantitatively random distribution (Fig. 1). EC₅₀ result for each fungicide was as follow; EC₅₀ for hexaconazole was in the range of 0.001 a. i. μg ml⁻¹ to 0.17 a. i. μg ml⁻¹; propiconazole from 0.001 a. i. μg ml⁻¹ to 0.47 a. i. μg ml⁻¹, and tebuconazole from 0.002 a. i. μg ml⁻¹ to 1.1 a. i. μg ml⁻¹.

Fig. 1

Differential responses of 66 isolates of Sclerotinia homoeocarpa to hexaconazole, propiconazole, and tebuconazole. The isolates were grown on PDA with various concentrations of hexaconazole, propiconazole, and tebuconazole for two days at 25°C in darkness.

Three S. homoeocarpa isolates that recorded the lowest EC₅₀ value were selected as the representative sensitive strains, while five S. homoeocarpa isolates showing EC₅₀ values greater than the isolates from golf course without prior history of fungicide application [(Sh14-2-1) by 20 times in hexaconazole, 50 times in propiconazole, and 35 times in tebuconazole] were selected as insensitive strains, short listing a final selection of 12 strains in total (Table 3).

Table 3

EC₅₀ values and the EC₅₀ ratio of resistant isolates (R) to sensitive isolates (S) of twelve selected isolates for each fungicide

In the sensitive S. homoeocarpa isolates, the EC₅₀ value was below 0.003 μg ml⁻¹ for hexaconazole, 0.006 μg ml⁻¹ for propiconazole, and 0.016 μg ml⁻¹ for tebuconazole. EC₅₀ value of insensitive strains was shown to be 50 times greater in hexaconazole, 50–70 times in propiconazole, and 77 times in tebuconazole (highest), compared to the sensitive isolates. On the concentration-reaction graph of the 12 selected isolates, hexaconazole, propiconazole, tebuconazole all showed distinguished inhibition rates in the concentration of 0.01 μg ml⁻¹, with 50% inhibition rate at concentrations of 0.1 μg ml⁻¹ (Fig. 2). Strains showing mycelial growth rates greater than 50% were 11 in hexaconazole among 66 isolates, 42 in propiconazole amongst 66 isolates, and 51 in tebuconazole amongst 66 isolates (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2

Differential responses of twelve isolates of Sclerotinia homoeocarpa to hexaconazole, propiconazole, and tebuconazole. The isolates were grown on PDA amended with various concentrations of hexaconazole, propiconazole, and tebuconazole for two days at 25°C in darkness. Relative mycelial growth in 0.1 a. i. μg ml⁻¹ of each fungicide had a distinct gap between sensitive (S) and resistant (R) isolates.

Fungicide resistance distribution for each strain group was analyzed by indicating the value of resistance factor (RF), range of EC₅₀ value, its mean with distinguished populations. Resistance Factor is a degree of increase in the fungicide resistance in comparison with isolate groups that were sensitive towards fungicides for there was no previous encounter reported early. Resistance factor was calculated by dividing the mean EC₅₀ value of strain groups with decreased sensitivity towards fungicides with the mean EC₅₀ value of strain groups showing selective sensitivity from golf courses that had no history of fungicide. Groups, with greater RF value from 2.7 to 13.3 times than that of Sh14 strain groups which had no history of fungicide, were separated (Table 4).

Table 4

Range, mean EC₅₀, and resistance factor (RF) for each fungicide in each population of Sclerotinia homoeocarpa from golf courses in Korea

Cross-resistance between triazole fungicides

As a result of pairwise comparison for determination of cross-resistance of 3 triazole fungicides (hexaconazole, propiconazole, and tebuconazole), based on EC₅₀ values from 66 isolates (Fig. 3), significant (P < 0.0001) relation coefficient (r ≥ 0.8), confirmed that cross resistance between hexaconazole, propiconazole, and tebuconazole was evident.

Fig. 3

Pairwise correlations of hexaconazole, tebuconazole, and propiconazole between logEC₅₀ values for 66 Sclerotinia homoeocarpa isolates including eight representative resistant isolates (R, red dot) and five representative sensitive isolates (S, blue dot).

Discussion

Among the 10 golf courses from which S. homoeocarpa isolates were collected, 9 had a history of using more than one type of triazole fungicides, and Ecoland golf course had no history of using fungicides since its establishment, thus enabling base lining the sensitivity to the triazole fungicides. Baseline sensitivity is the standard sensitivity of the fungi towards the fungicide. Isolates with baseline sensitivity are useful in investigating and analyzing the degree of induction of resistance against the fungicide in certain strain groups, and differences in genetic composition of strains transited to resistance, and researching on genes related to fungicide resistance (Russell, 2004). Hsiang et al. (2007) researched on the distribution of baseline sensitivity in the S. homoeocarpa isolates before the registration and usage of triazole in all regions of Ontario, Canada, and all areas except for the ones along the borders of the United States, propiconazole showed EC₅₀ value lower than 0.009 μg ml⁻¹ while tebuconazole showed mean EC₅₀ value lower than 0.03 μg ml⁻¹ in all groups. EC₅₀ value of selected sensitive strains in this research lie within the EC₅₀ range of representative sensitive strains obtained from golf courses that had no history of fungicide in Canada, United States, and others, thus showing the baseline sensitivity towards these triazole fungicides.

When analyzing the concentration reaction graph of 12 selected isolates, inhibition rates were evident at concentrations of 0.01 μg ml⁻¹ for hexaconazole, propiconazole, and tebuconazole, and sensitive or resistant isolates could be distinguished (Fig. 2) based on the 50% inhibition rates at concentrations of 0.1 μg ml⁻¹. Concentration of 0.1 μg ml⁻¹ is thus used as threshold concentration to distinguish between sensitive and resistant strains in earlier reports by Miller et al. (2002), Jo et al. (2006, 2008), and Popko et al. (2012, 2013). In this current work sensitive and insensitive strains could be distinguished at concentrations of 0.1 μg ml⁻¹ based on the 50% inhibition rate. Popko et al. (2012) used fungicides in 4 golf courses whereby the effectiveness of fungal prevention decreased after spraying of propiconazole, and infection appeared after 7 days. Separated isolates showed mycelium growth rates greater than 50% in the determinant concentration (0.1 μg ml⁻¹). Based on this result, Popko et al. (2013) reported that by marking the 50% of mycelium growth rate 0.1 μg ml⁻¹, strain groups showing higher mycelium growth rate can easily be distinguished as strains indicating practical field resistance (PFR). In this research, strains showing mycelium growth rate of greater than 50% in the concentration of 0.1 μg ml⁻¹ were 11 out of 66 strains in hexaconazole, 42 out of 66 strains in propiconazole, and 51 out of 66 in tebuconazole (Fig. 2), predicting greater occurrence of strains showing PFR in propiconazole and tebuconazole, also requiring further verification in field experiments.

As a result of pairwise comparisons between the 3 triazole fungicides, relation coefficient of greater than 0.8 was obtained, confirming cross-resistance. Relativity to tebuconazole-propiconazole showed the same results for the triazole fungicide as that of Miller et al. (2002), and in Colletotrichum cereale that causes plant anthracnose, tebuconazole and propiconazole showed significant correlation, indicating that there may be genuine correlation between the two fungicides (Wong and Midland, 2007). Further research on the genetic understanding of intersected resistance in aspect of genetic relation between triazole fungicides, could lead to a better understanding of this aspect.

Golembiewski et al. (1995) verified that the actual fungicide effectiveness decreased in groups showing RF values greater than 50 in propiconazole, and Burpee et al. (1997) reported that in propiconazole groups with RF values of 5.8, decrease in the effectiveness of fungicide was observed and the time taken for induction of disease was shortened following fungicide application. Miller et al. (2002) reported that with increasing EC₅₀ values of propiconazole, the time taken for the reoccurrence of infection was significantly shortened, AUDPC (area under disease progress curve) and EC₅₀ showed proportional correlation, and the insensitive strains showed significantly high AUDPC values. However, Jo et al. (2006) reported that in 10 regions of Ohio, the mean EC₅₀ values ranged 0.082–0.171 μg ml⁻¹, showed the elevated EC₅₀ value compared to the sensitive one but not decreasing the effectiveness of propiconazole. Hsiang et al. (2007) also stated that the PFR of group with 4.2 RF value against propiconazole was not observed, but when injection experiments were conducted on selected sensitive (EC₅₀ < 0.01 μg ml⁻¹), moderately resistant (EC₅₀ > 0.01 μg ml⁻¹), and resistant (EC₅₀ > 0.1 μg ml⁻¹) strains, the time taken for less sensitive strains to exhibit the infection was shortened, showing significant difference in the number of symptom per pot after 2 weeks of fungicide usage. The precise RF and standard EC₅₀ triggering PFR was required to be researched in relation with the actual effectiveness of the fungicide and sensitivity of strains in vitro.

Through this research, sensitivity of S. homoeocarpa isolates to triazole fungicides separated from 10 golf courses was identified, and the fungicide resistance of isolates was detected compared to control isolates taken from golf courses with no previous history of fungicide application. Further research on verification of PFR on actual field tests, based on in vitro results, and elucidating the mechanism of resistance induction by comparison of resistant strains and sensitive strains could prove beneficial towards a fundamental understanding of this research.

Article information Continued