*Corresponding author: Phone) +82-54-530-1212, FAX) +82-54-530-1218, E-mail) Body
Plant Pathol. J. 34(4):297-307 (2018)
In the original version of this article, there was an error in the scientific name in the title of Table 2, Table 3, Fig. 3 and Fig. 4.
The correct version of the title of Table 2, Table 3, Fig. 3 and Fig. 4 are given below.
The publisher would like to apologize for any inconvenience caused.
Table 2. Morphometric comparison of second-stage juveniles (J2s) in Heterodera trifolii and Heterodera schachtii
Table 3. Morphometric comparison of vulval cone in Heterodera trifolii and Heterodera schachtii
Fig. 3. PCR pattern of COI gene and ITS region of Heterodera trifolii and Heterodera schachtii amplified with species-specific primers designed in this study (M: 100 bp DNA ladder). Primers of Hetero β-tubul were designed at the conserved region of beta-tubulin from the two Heterodera species. The information of each primer is available in Supplementary Fig. 1 and Supplementary Table 1.
Fig. 4. PCR patterns of ITS region (A) (approximately: 1,025 bp) and COI gene (B) (approximately: 450 bp) of Heterodera trifolii (YS503) and Heterodera schachtii (GC147) amplified with universal primers (DNA ladder: Bioneer 1 Kb DNA ladder). The information of each primer is available in Supplementary Table 1.
PDF Links
PubReader
Full text via DOI
Full text via PMC
Download Citation
Print
