Plant Pathol J > Volume 35(5); 2019 > Article
Choi, Oh, Cho, Ju, Hu, Kim, Seo, Park, Domier, Hammond, Song, and Lim: Full-Length Infectious Clones of Two New Isolates of Tomato Mosaic Virus Induce Distinct Symptoms Associated with Two Differential Amino Acid Residues in 128-kDa Protein

Abstract

In 2017, two new tomato mosaic virus (ToMV) isolates were collected from greenhouses in Buyeo, Chungcheongnam-do, South Korea. Full-length cDNAs of the new ToMV isolates were cloned into dual cauliflower mosaic virus 35S and T7 promoter-driven vectors, sequenced and their pathogenicities investigated. The nucleotide sequences of isolates GW1 (MH507165) and GW2 (MH507166) were 99% identical, resulting in only two amino acid differences in nonconserved region II and the helicase domain, Ile668Thr and Val834Ile. The two isolates were most closely related to a ToMV isolate from Taiwan (KJ207374). Isolate GW1 (Ile668, Val834) induced a systemic hypersensitive response in Nicotiana benthamiana compared with the isolate GW2, which a single residue substitution showed was due to Val834.

Production of tomato in Korea has increased in recent years, largely due to demands for phytonutrient-rich foods that are beneficial for human health and associated with reduced risks of diseases like diabetes and prostate cancer. Most tomatoes in Korea are greenhouse grown, where insect pests and seedborne diseases pose major threats to crop yield and quality. Viral diseases of tomato have been reported to affect up to 26.5% of tomato production (Choi et al., 2010). In a recent survey of tomato viral diseases, we found that the main causes of yield loss were tomato yellow leaf curl virus (TYLCV) and tomato mosaic virus (ToMV) (Choi et al., 2018). While TYLCV is transmitted by whiteflies, ToMV is transmitted mechanically or by contaminated seeds (Procter and Fry, 1965). Effective quarantine measures are required to prevent the introduction of ToMV-infected seeds through the international seed trade, as most tomato seeds planted in Korea are imported; there is a close relationship between ToMV incidence in tomato crops and sources of contaminated seed. Therefore, sequence analysis of new ToMV isolates can be used to determine their probable origin.
ToMV belongs to the genus Tobamovirus, family Virgaviridae. The genome of c.6400 nt encodes four proteins: the replicase components: the 128-kDa and its 182-kDa readthrough product from open reading frame (ORF) 1 and fusion protein from ORFs 1 and 2, respectively, the 30 kDa cell-to-cell movement protein (MP) from ORF3, and the 17 kDa coat protein (CP) from ORF4 (Ishibashi and Ishikawa, 2014). The 128-kDa and 180-kDa proteins are translated from the genomic RNA, whereas MP and CP are translated from 3′ co-terminal subgenomic RNAs. The 128-kDa protein includes methyltransferase and helicase (HEL) domains (Buck, 1999), and has a silencing suppressor function, which inhibits production of small interfering RNAs and microRNAs before they can bind to RNA-induced silencing complexes (RISCs), although pre-assembled RISCs are not affected (Csorba et al., 2007). The silencing suppressor in the 128-kDa protein targets both polarities of small RNAs, and small RNA duplexes originating from the viral genome (Kubota et al., 2003; Kurihara et al., 2007).
In 2017 greenhouse grown tomato leaf samples with virus-like symptoms were collected (Choi et al., 2018) and seven ToMV-infected tissue samples from three locations were used to construct full-length infectious cDNA clones. Total RNAs were extracted from pooled leaf tissues using TriZol reagent (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA), and stored at −70°C prior to use as templates; full-length cDNA was synthesized using a ReverTra Ace-α kit (Toyobo, Osaka, Japan) and a set of primers designed based on consensus sequence of a recently reported ToMV isolate; the 5′ primer included the T7 promoter sequence immediately upstream of the ToMV 5′ sequence (Table 1). Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification of complete ToMV genomes was performed using high-fidelity KOD FX NEO polymerase (Toyobo), with amplification conditions of 2 min at 94°C, followed by 8 cycles of 10 s at 98°C, 30 s at 58°C, and 5 min at 72°C, and then 27 cycles of 10 s at 98°C, 30 s at 63°C, and 5 min at 72°C. The resulting amplicon was analyzed by electrophoresis in a 0.8% agarose gel and visualized using a transilluminator; the full-length product was then ligated at 4°C for 12 h to the T-Blunt vector (All In PCR cloning kit, BioFact, Daejeon, Korea) prior to transformation of Escherichia coli. Thirteen full-length clones were obtained and used to synthesize in vitro transcripts as described (Han et al., 2017). Transcripts from eight clones produced symptoms when inoculated to Nicotiana benthamiana, and only symptom-inducing cDNA clones were sequenced at Macrogen, Inc. (Seoul, Korea) using the primers shown in Table 1. Analysis of the eight full-length clones showed that there were two distinct sequences, of which seven full-length cDNA clones were identified as GW1 (accession No. MH507165) and one as GW2 (accession No. MH507166). Isolates GW1 and GW2 both have genome sequences of 6,383 nt and share 99.95% nt identity. Analysis using DNAMAN (Lynnon BioSoft, Quebec, Canada) showed that each contains the expected four ORFs that are predicted to encode the 128-kDa, 182-kDa readthrough protein, 30-kDa MP, and 17.5-kDa CP. Only two amino acid residues differentiate the isolates, I668T and V834I in the 128-kDa protein. The nucleotide sequences of isolates GW1 and GW2 and 45 ToMV sequences obtained from GenBank were analyzed phylogenetically using the neighbor-joining method in MEGA6 with 1,000 bootstrap replicates (Fig. 1). Isolates GW1 and GW2 were most closely related to Taiwanese isolate Penghu (KJ207374), with 99.22% and 99.23% identity, respectively. Similar comparisons of the predicted amino acid sequences from isolates GW1 and GW2 ORFs with those of ToMV-Penghu showed identities of 99.37% and 99.40% (128 kDa); 99.28% and 99.30% (182 kDa); 99.62% for the MP of both, and 99.17% for the CP of both isolates.
To test the basis for the differences in pathogenicity of GW1 and GW2 and make it easier to inoculate plants with the cloned viruses, the full-length cDNAs were subcloned into the pJY vector (Park et al., 2017). First, the 5′ portions, including the T7 promoter, were subcloned following digestion with BglII and PstI. The 3′ portion of each clone was separately inserted following digestion with PstI and XmaI, to reassemble complete genomes of each isolate (Fig. 2A). Potential differences in infectivity and pathogenicity between isolates GW1 and GW2 resulting from the two variant amino acids at I668T and V834I in the 128-kDa protein were examined by transforming the respective pJY constructs into Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain GV2260, and agroinfiltrating leaves of 20-day-old N. benthamiana plants as described (Han et al., 2017). In addition, in vitro transcripts generated by the method of Kim et al. (2017) were inoculated to Solanum lycopersicum. Plants were grown with a 14 h photoperiod at 26°C. At 7 days post inoculation (dpi), GW1 induced apical necrosis with a systemic hypersensitive response in N. benthamiana, whereas GW2 produced mild mosaic symptoms at 20 dpi (Fig. 2B). In S. lycopersicum, GW1 and GW2 both produced very mild symptoms (data not shown). Hence, the two amino acid differences between isolates GW1 and GW2 were associated with different symptoms in N. benthamiana, but not in S. lycopersicum. Overlap extension PCR (Higuchi et al., 1988) was used to separately substitute amino acid residues 668 and 834 of GW1 to distinguish the effects of each. Mutagenic primers were designed to change Ile 668 to Thr (GW1-I668T) and Val 834 to Ile (GW1-V834I) respectively (Table 1), with plasmid pJY:ToMV-GW1 as the template for each substitution. PCR mixtures contained 4 μl template, 1.5 μl of 10 pmol each primer, 10 μl 2 mM dNTPs, 25 μl 2× PCR buffer for KOD FX Neo, 1 μl of KOD FX Neo and 7 μl distilled water. PCR conditions were as follows: 2 min at 94°C, 30 cycles of 10 s at 98°C, 30 s at 58°C, and 30 s at 68°C. Products were gel-extracted and purified; 2 μl of 5′ and 3′ GW1 mutant PCR products in equal molar ratio were used as PCR template with 1.5 μl of 10 pmol ToMV overlap F/ToMV overlap R as described above. Amplified GW1 mutants were separately ligated into gel-extracted pJY:ToMV-GW1 digested with PstI and BamHI (located at nt1844 and nt3335). The symptoms induced by pJY:ToMV-GW1 mutants were compared to the wild-type ToMV-GW1 and ToMV-GW2; the mutants were transformed into A. tumefaciens and agroinfiltrated to N. benthamiana. Symptoms were observed from 7 days post agroinfiltration. Mutant GW1-V834I (in the HEL domain) yielded mild symptoms similar to those induced by GW2, whereas mutant GW1-I668T induced severe symptoms, including systemic necrosis at 10 dpi, clearly linking HEL residue V834 to the induction of systemic necrosis (Fig. 2B). Multiple studies have shown that the tobamoviral 128-kDa protein plays a role in symptom severity because of changes in viral replication and RNA silencing suppressor function. Especially, variations in symptom development were mapped to amino acid substitutions in nonconserved region II (NONII, equivalent to residues 454-806 of TMV) (Bao et al., 1996) and the HEL domain of the 128-kDa protein (Kubota et al., 2003; Wang et al., 2012). Our finding that two isolates with amino acid differences in HEL and NONII show different symptoms in N. benthamiana are consistent with prior results of other groups and clearly link HEL residue V834 to the induction of systemic necrosis, reinforcing the importance of the multifunctional 128-kDa protein function in the Tobamovirus replication cycle (Bao et al., 1996; Kubota et al., 2003; Wang et al., 2012).

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by a grant from the Next-Generation BioGreen 21 Program (Project No. PJ01365501), Rural Development Administration, Republic of Korea.

Fig. 1
Phylogenetic analysis of the new tomato mosaic virus (ToMV) isolates. The phylogenetic tree was constructed by the neighbor-joining method with 1,000 bootstrap replicates. The sequences of 45 ToMV isolates were selected from National Center for Biotechnology Information GenBank. The labels in the tree indicate name of isolates/accession number/country. The numbers at the nodes are bootstrap values above 50%. The scale bar indicates the number of nucleotide substitutions.
ppj-35-538f1.gif
Fig. 2
Construction of tomato mosaic virus (ToMV) infectious clones in T-Blunt vector and binary vector, and symptoms induced by ToMV GW1 and GW2. (A) Total RNA was extracted from seven pooled ToMV-infected samples, and cDNA synthesized using ToMV-specific 3′ end and random primer. To generate infectious cDNA clones, full-length cDNA was amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using ToMV-specific primer sets (Table 1). The upstream primer included a T7 promoter and BglII enzyme site, and the downstream primer added an XmaI enzyme site. The full-length ToMV PCR product was cloned into the T-blunt vector. The full-length nucleotide sequences, and the predicted amino acid sequences of ToMV GW1 and GW2 open reading frames were compared. The only two amino acid differences between the two isolates occurred in the 128 kDa protein. Full-length ToMV cloned T-Blunt vector was digested with BglII and PstI restriction enzymes. First, the 5′ fragment (1.8 kb) was inserted in pJY vector (Han et al., 2017). Subsequently, using PstI and XmaI restriction enzymes, the 4.6-kb 3′ fragment was cloned in pJY vector already containing the 5′ fragment. The two infectious clones were designated ToMV GW1 and GW2 and were inoculated to Nicotiana benthamiana either by using in vitro transcripts or agroinfiltration. The nucleotide sequence differences resulting in amino acid differences at residues 668 and 834 are indicated. (B) The infectious clones of isolates GW1 and GW2, and of mutants GW1-V834I and GW1-I668T of ToMV were each inoculated to N. benthamiana by agroinfiltration at the in same concentration (O.D.600), to plants at the 3-4 leaf stage. Symptoms were recorded at the indicated days post inoculation (dpi). Virus infections were confirmed by reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction.
ppj-35-538f2.gif
Table 1
Primers used in this study
Primer Sequence Length (bp)
ToMV T7 BglII F 5′-AAAAGATCTTAATACGACTCACTATAGGGGTATTTTTACAACAA TACAACAACAAC-3′ 58
ToMV XmaI R 5′-AAACCCGGGTGGGCCCCAACCGGGGGTTCC-3′ 30
ToMV seq F 1 5′-CAGTATTGAACTATACCTTTCTA-3′ 23
ToMV seq F 2 5′-GAAAGAATCTTGTTAGAGGA-3′ 20
ToMV seq F 3 5′-GTCTCTCGAGCAGTTTCATAT-3′ 21
ToMV seq F 4 5′-GACACGTGATGTGCACGTC-3′ 19
ToMV seq R 1 5′-AAGGTTTCCACACCTCGCTG-3′ 20
ToMV seq R 2 5′-CAGCAGCAGTGTAATATGAC-3′ 20
ToMV seq R 3 5′-GCCAAGAAATCCTCTAGACC-3′ 20
ToMV seq R 4 5′-CTAATAAGTAACTACTAACCCG-3′ 22
ToMV overlap F 5′-AAACTGCAGCAAAGGTAATAGTAGCAGTTATGAGCA-3′ 36
ToMV overlap R 5′-AAAGGATCCATCACAACGGTGTAGTACTT-3′ 29
ToMV inner F T.V 5′-CTTCATACACTAGGAGCGA-3′ 19
ToMV inner R T.V 5′-TCGCTCCTAGTGTATGAAG-3′ 19
ToMV inner F V.I 5′-GGTGGATGGCATTCCAG-3′ 17
ToMV inner R V.I 5′-CTGGAATGCCATCCACC-3′ 17

References

Bao, Y, Carter, SA and Nelson, RS 1996. The 126- and 183-kilodalton proteins of tobacco mosaic virus, and not their common nucleotide sequence, control mosaic symptom formation in tobacco. J Virol. 70:6378-6383.
crossref pmid pmc
Buck, KW 1999. Replication of Tobacco mosaic virus RNA. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 354:613-627.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
Choi, G-W, Kim, B, Ju, H, Cho, S, Seo, E, Kim, J, Park, J, Hammond, J and Lim, H-S 2018. Dual infections of Tomato mosaic virus (ToMV) and Tomato yellow leaf curl virus (TYLCV), or Tomato mosaic virus (ToMV) and Tomato chlorosis virus (ToCV), detected in tomato fields located in Chungcheongnam-do in 2017. Korean J Agric Sci. 45:38-42.
Choi, HS, Lee, SH, Kim, MK, Kwak, HR, Kim, JS, Cho, JD and Choi, GS 2010 Occurrence of virus diseases on major crops in 2009. Res Plant Dis. 16:1-9 (in Korean).
crossref
Csorba, T, Bovi, A, Dalmay, T and Burgyán, J 2007. The p122 subunit of Tobacco mosaic virus replicase is a potent silencing suppressor and compromises both small interfering RNA-and microRNA-mediated pathways. J Virol. 81:11768-11780.
crossref pmid pmc
Han, S-H, Park, J-S, Han, J-Y, Gong, J-S, Park, C-H, Kim, J-K, Seo, E-Y, Domier, LL, Hammond, J and Lim, H-S 2017. New Korean isolates of Pepper mild mottle virus (PMMoV) differ in symptom severity and subcellular localization of the 126 kDa protein. Virus Genes. 53:434-445.
crossref pmid
Higuchi, R, Krummel, B and Saiki, RK 1988. A general method of in vitro preparation and specific mutagenesis of DNA fragments: study of protein and DNA interactions. Nucleic Acids Res. 16:7351-7367.
crossref pmid pmc
Ishibashi, K and Ishikawa, M 2014. Mechanisms of tomato mosaic virus RNA replication and its inhibition by the host resistance factor Tm-1. Curr Opin Virol. 9:8-13.
crossref pmid
Kim, I-H, Han, J-Y, Cho, I-S, Ju, HK, Moon, JS, Seo, E-Y, Kim, HG, Hammond, J and Lim, H-S 2017. Generation of an infectious clone of a new Korean isolate of Apple chlorotic leaf spot virus driven by dual 35S and T7 promoters in a versatile binary vector. Plant Pathol J. 33:608-613.
crossref pmid pmc
Kubota, K, Tsuda, S, Tamai, A and Meshi, T 2003. Tomato mosaic virus replication protein suppresses virus-targeted post-transcriptional gene silencing. J Virol. 77:11016-11026.
crossref pmid pmc
Kurihara, Y, Inaba, N, Kutsuna, N, Takeda, A, Tagami, Y and Watanabe, Y 2007. Binding of tobamovirus replication protein with small RNA duplexes. J Gen Virol. 88(Pt 8):2347-2352.
crossref pmid
Park, C-H, Ju, H-K, Han, J-Y, Park, J-S, Kim, I-H, Seo, E-Y, Kim, J-K, Hammond, J and Lim, H-S 2017. Complete nucleotide sequences and construction of full-length infectious cDNA clones of cucumber green mottle mosaic virus (CGMMV) in a versatile newly developed binary vector including both 35S and T7 promoters. Virus Genes. 53:286-299.
crossref pmid
Procter, CH and Fry, PR 1965. Seed transmission of tobacco mosaic virus in tomato. N Z J Agric Res. 8:367-369.
crossref
Wang, L-Y, Lin, S-S, Hung, T-H, Li, T-K, Lin, N-C and Shen, T-L 2012. Multiple domains of the Tobacco mosaic virus p126 protein can independently suppress local and systemic RNA silencing. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact. 25:648-657.
crossref pmid
TOOLS
METRICS Graph View
  • 2 Web of Science
  • 2 Crossref
  •  0 Scopus
  • 3,266 View
  • 44 Download
Related articles


ABOUT
BROWSE ARTICLES
EDITORIAL POLICY
FOR CONTRIBUTORS
Editorial Office
Rm,904 (New Bldg.) The Korean Science & Technology Center 22,
Teheran-ro 7-Gil, Gangnamgu, Seoul 06130, Korea
Tel: +82-2-557-9360    Fax: +82-2-557-9361    E-mail: paper@kspp.org                

Copyright © 2024 by Korean Society of Plant Pathology.

Developed in M2PI

Close layer
prev next