Induced Systemic Resistance and the Rhizosphere Microbiome

Article information

Plant Pathol J. 2013;29(2):136-143
1Plant-Microbe Interactions, Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Utrecht University, Padualaan 8, 3584 CH Utrecht, the Netherlands
2Centre for BioSystems Genomics, P.O. Box 98, 6700 AB Wageningen, the Netherlands
*Corresponding author. Phone) +31 30 2536861, E-mail) P.A.H.M.Bakker@uu.nl
#

Current address: Ceradis BV, P.O. Box 376, 6700 AJ Wageningen, the Netherlands

Received 2012 July 23; Accepted 2012 August 22.

Abstract

Microbial communities that are associated with plant roots are highly diverse and harbor tens of thousands of species. This so-called microbiome controls plant health through several mechanisms including the suppression of infectious diseases, which is especially prominent in disease suppressive soils. The mechanisms implicated in disease suppression include competition for nutrients, antibiosis, and induced systemic resistance (ISR). For many biological control agents ISR has been recognized as the mechanism that at least partly explains disease suppression. Implications of ISR on recruitment and functioning of the rhizosphere microbiome are discussed.

The rhizosphere microbiome

Plant roots growing in the dark realms of soils are certainly not solitary. They sustain a community of organisms that includes trillions of microbial cells belonging to tens of thousands of species. In this respect plants and animals are actually quite alike, as also animals live in close association with complex microbial communities. The human gut microflora is estimated to consist of 1014 bacterial cells, ten times more than there are human cells in a body, and belonging to several thousands of species (Arumugam et al., 2011). These microorganisms in the gut play a role in nutrient uptake (Derrien et al., 2010) and obesity (Turnbaugh et al., 2006, 2009), absorption of herbal medicine (Crow, 2011), control of gastrointestinal pathogens (Khoruts et al., 2010), immunity against diseases (Fagundes et al., 2012), and they even are suggested to influence mammal behaviour (Diaz Heijtz et al., 2011; Grenham et al., 2011; Williams et al., 2012). The collective microbiome in the plant rhizosphere is similarly important for the functioning and health of plants. Uptake of nutrients for a large part depends on microorganisms. Not only are plants directly assisted in their phosphate (Khan et al., 2009; Van der Heijden et al., 2006) and nitrogen uptake (Kraiser et al., 2011) by microoganisms, but many fungal, bacterial and archaeal taxa are also important for nutrient cycling in soil (Van der Heijden et al., 2008). Furthermore, rhizosphere microorganisms support plants through direct control of diseases and their impact on the disease defensive capacity of plants (Bakker et al., 2007, Berendsen et al., 2012) and on tolerance to abiotic stresses (Yang et al., 2008). The importance of the rhizosphere microflora for plant growth and health has been studied for decades. Rhizodeposition of carbon compounds increases microbial activity and biomass in rhizosphere soil (Hartmann et al., 2009), and interactions between members of the microbial rhizosphere community are important drivers of plant growth (Raaijmakers et al., 2009). Compared to the human gut microbiome, the microbiome associated with the plant root is staggeringly complex (Berendsen et al., 2012). Around 3000 culturable soil fungi have been described (Gams, 2007), but this number will undoubtedly increase with the application of molecular techniques (Anderson and Cairney, 2004). In sugar beet rhizosphere soil over 33,000 bacterial and archaeal operational taxonomic units (OTUs) were detected (Mendes et al., 2011). Such a microbial diversity extends the functional repertoire of the plant and its associated microbes beyond imagination. The function that we focus on in this mini-review is the ability of specific root associated microorganisms to elicit induced systemic resistance against pathogens.

Disease suppressive soils

According to the definition by Baker and Cook (1974) disease suppressive soils are “soils in which the pathogen does not establish or persist, establishes but causes little or no damage, or establishes and causes disease for a while but thereafter the disease is less important, although the pathogen may persist in the soil.” Biological factors have been identified as the most important element in disease suppression in such soils (Mazzola, 2002). A prominent example of disease suppressiveness is take-all decline (TAD). When wheat is grown continuously in the same field, take-all disease caused by Gaeumannomyces graminis var. tritici will develop over the years. However, after a severe outbreak of take-all, the soil becomes suppressive against the disease (Weller et al., 2002). This suppressiveness can be negated by heat treatment and it is transferrable to a conducive soil by mixing a small ratio of suppressive to the conducive soil (Raaijmakers and Weller, 1998). Whereas build up of 2,4-diacetylphloroglucinol producing Pseudomonas fluorescens populations appears to be solely responsible for take-all decline (Raaijmakers and Weller, 1998), 16S rRNA-based techniques have identified additional bacterial taxa that may be involved in take-all decline (Sanguin et al., 2009; Schreiner et al., 2010). Other well examined examples of disease suppressive soils include Fusarium wilt suppressiveness (Alabouvette, 1999), tobacco black root rot disease suppressiveness (Kyselkova et al., 2009), and Rhizoctonia solani suppressiveness (Mendes et al., 2011). In soil naturally suppressive to Fusarium wilt, a synergistic effect of competition for carbon by non-pathogenic Fusarium oxysporum and production of redox-active phenazines appears to play an important role in suppressiveness (Mazurier et al., 2009). Using a 16S rRNA taxonomic microarray several bacterial taxa, including Pseudomonas, Azospirillum, Gluconacetobacter, Bulkholderia, Comamonas and Sphingomonadaceae, were shown to be more prevalent in tobacco black root rot suppressive soil than in conducive soil (Kyselkova et al., 2009). This suggests that suppression of Thielaviopsis basicola in this soil is based on a microbial consortium. Similar findings have been described for a potato common scab suppressive soil (Rosenzweig et al., 2012). An in depth study of the rhizosphere microbiome of the R. solani suppressive soil also revealed that a consortium of microbes governs disease suppression. Using PhyloChip analysis, which allows simultaneous detection of ~60,000 bacterial and archaeal OTUs, 17 taxa belonging to the β-proteobacteria, γ-proteobacteria, and the firmicutes were identified as being closely associated with disease suppressiveness (Mendes et al., 2011). The group of Pseudomonaceae has been suggested as a player in disease suppressiveness in all aforementioned disease suppressive soils. Control of diseases by these fluorescent pseudomonads has been studied in detail over the last three to four decades (Weller, 2007). The main modes of action of disease suppression by fluorescent Pseudomonas spp. are siderophore mediated competition for iron (Duijff et al., 1999), antibiosis (Raaijmakers et al., 2002), and induced systemic resistance (ISR) (Bakker et al., 2007). During the last two decades the involvement of ISR has been recognized as an important and effective mode of action for a range of bacterial and fungal biological control agents.

ISR eliciting biocontrol agents and ISR eliciting determinants

In the early nineties, plant growth promoting rhizobacteria were studied for their abilities to elicit ISR, with special focus on Pseudomonas spp.. It was discovered that when certain biocontrol pseudomonads were applied and kept spatially separated from the pathogen, they still reduced disease, suggesting that the mode of action must be plant mediated (Van Peer et al., 1991; Wei et al., 1991). Induced resistance is a state of enhanced defensive capacity developed by a plant when appropriately stimulated (Van Loon et al., 1998). There is a long and growing list of both biotic and abiotic agents that can protect crops against pathogens by eliciting ISR (Da Rocha and Hammerschmidt, 2005; Reglinski and Walters, 2009). Many bacterial biocontrol agents have been implicated to elicit ISR (De Vleesschauwer and Höfte, 2009), including Bacillus spp. (Jourdan et al., 2009; Kloepper et al., 2004), Pseudomonas spp. (Bakker et al., 2007), and Serratia spp. (Press et al., 1997; Schuhegger et al., 2006). Fungal biocontrol agents reported to elicit ISR include Trichoderma spp. (Koike et al., 2001; Segarra et al., 2009), Piriformospora indica (Shoresh et al., 2010), Penicillium simplicissimum (Elsharkawy et al., 2012), Phoma sp. (Sultana et al., 2009), non-pathogenic Fusarium oxysporum (Fravel et al., 2003), and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (Pozo et al., 2009). The above mentioned list of examples of ISR eliciting microorganisms is certainly not exhaustive and one may wonder if there are biological control agents that can not elicit ISR.

Also for microbial determinants that are involved in ISR the list is growing. The first reports on bacterial determinants involved in ISR concerned P. fluorescens lipopolysaccharides (Leeman et al., 1995a; Van Peer et al., 1992) and siderophores (Maurhofer et al., 1994). Many more ISR elicitors have been identified by application of purified compounds and the use of mutants that lack the production of a possible eliciting compound (Bakker et al., 2003; De Vleesschauwer and Höfte, 2009). ISR elicitors that were identified using such strategies include flagella (Meziane et al., 2005), iron-regulated metabolites (Audenaert et al., 2002; De Vleesschauwer et al., 2008; Meziane et al., 2005; Ongena et al., 2005; Ran et al., 2005), the antibiotics 2,4-diacetylphloroglucinol (Iavicoli et al., 2003; Weller et al., 2012) and pyocyanin (Audenaert et al., 2002; De Vleesschauwer et al., 2006), biosurfactants (Ongena et al., 2007; Tran et al., 2007), and volatile organic compounds (Ryu et al., 2004). Moreover, redundancy of ISR elicitors in a single biological control microorganism has been reported (Bakker et al., 2003; De Vleesschauwer and Höfte, 2009). Taking into account the high population densities of microorganisms in the rhizosphere (Katznelson et al., 1948) and the high diversity of these microbial communities (Mendes et al., 2011), on top of the many microorganisms that have the potential to elicit ISR and the variety in ISR eliciting determinants, it seems reasonable to assume that most plants are in the state of ISR. However, under field conditions ISR can effectively suppress disease (Leeman et al., 1995b, Wei et al., 1996), suggesting that untreated plants are not in the state of ISR.

Why are not all plants in the state of ISR?

The rhizosphere microflora contains an incredible number of bacterial species (Mendes et al., 2011), and within one species different genotypes are present, as described for Pseudomonas spp. (Glandorf et al., 1993, 1994; Lemanceau et al., 1995). To effectively elicit ISR high population densities of a specific biocontrol strain are introduced into the soil or rhizosphere, usually around 107 colony forming units (cfu) per gram of root, see for example Van Pelt et al. (2008). Dose response studies for biological control agents revealed that high populations are needed for effective control of diseases (Bull et al., 1991; Johnson and DiLeone, 1999; Montesinos and Bonaterra, 1996; Raaijmakers and Weller, 1998). Typically bacterial population densities of at least 105 cfu per gram of root are required for control of diseases by fluorescent pseudomonads, either mediated by antibiosis (Raaijmakers and Weller, 1998), or by ISR (Raaijmakers et al., 1995). It seems unlikely that such high population densities of a specific bacterial genotype are present in the rhizospheres of plants in the field, although it has been reported for disease suppressive soils. In take-all decline soil, 2,4-diacetylphloroglucinol producing fluorescent Pseudomonas spp. were detected at densities above the threshold level of 105 per gram (De Souza et al., 2003; Raaijmakers and Weller, 1998). Even if one specific bacterial genotype would reach population densities above this threshold, there is specificity in ISR both on the bacterial side and the plant side (Van Loon and Bakker, 2005).

What’s in it for the eliciting bacteria?

Stimulation of ISR eliciting bacteria by plants under pathogen attack was reported by Rudrappa et al. (2008). The roots of A. thaliana plants infected by P. syringae pv. tomato secreted elevated levels of malic acid, and in a dose dependent manner malic acid stimulated binding to and biofilm formation on the roots by the ISR eliciting Bacillus subtilis strain FB17. In this situation the plant offers a more hospitable rhizosphere environment to the bacteria and in return the plant benefits from protection offered by the bacteria. Rhizobacteria-mediated ISR affects activity and growth of pathogenic microorganisms and may also affect the growth and activity of the indigenous rhizosphere microflora and introduced biological control agents. ISR eliciting microbes may modulate defense responses of the plant to their own benefit (Zamioudis and Pieterse, 2012). In this context it is interesting that in the rhizosphere of Arabidopsis mutant myb72, that can not express Pseudomonas- or Trichoderma-mediated ISR (Segarra et al., 2009; Van der Ent et al., 2008), population densities of strains of fluorescent Pseudomonas spp. that are able to trigger ISR in wild-type Arabidopsis are much lower than their rhizosphere populations in the wild-type (Doornbos et al., 2009). This suggests cross communication between the plant and the ISR-eliciting bacteria, resulting in rewards for the plant, that becomes less susceptible to pathogen attack, and the bacteria, that establish higher population densities. Whereas in the absence of pathogens the state of induced resistance poses slight fitness costs on the plant, when pathogens are present the benefits of induced resistance greatly outweigh the costs (Van Hulten et al., 2006).

In Arabidopsis, a possible impact of the constitutive expression of induced resistance on bacterial community structure and diversity in the rhizosphere was studied (Hein et al., 2008). However, differences in bacterial diversity that were observed in this study could not be related to the expression of induced resistance. Application of defense inducing phytohormones salicylic acid and jasmonic acid did not result in major shifts in Arabidopsis rhizosphere bacterial communities (Doornbos et al., 2011). In the rhizospheres of Arabidopsis accessions RLD and WS-0, bacterial communities are distinct from those of Col-0 and five other accessions (Micallef et al., 2009). These data do suggest a possible impact of defense signaling on bacterial community structure, since RLD and WS-0 are relatively insensitive to ethylene and impaired in the expression of ISR compared to the other accessions (Ton et al., 1999, 2001).

Recent studies have provided exciting evidence that plants under attack recruit beneficial microbes in their rhizospheres, for example in Arabidopsis under attack of a bacterial pathogen (Rudrappa et al., 2008) or in pepper that is being fed upon by aphids (Lee et al., 2012). Such recruitment of beneficial microbes is also evident in monocultures of wheat, in which after an initial outbreak of take-all disease, disease suppressiveness caused by 2,4-diacetylphoroglucinol producing pseudomonads develops (Weller et al., 2002). Support for a cry for help hypothesis can also be found in a recent study by Mavrodi et al. (2012) in which 2,4-diacetylphloroglucinol producing pseudomonads were recruited in the rhizosphere of wheat under irrigated conditions and under dry conditions phenazine producing pseudomonads were recruited. G. graminis var. tritici, that is sensitive to 2,4-diacetylphloroglucinol, is the major pathogen under irrigated conditions, whereas R. solani, sensitive to phenazines, is the major pathogen under dry conditions.

Concluding remarks

Despite a century long history of rhizosphere research (Hartmann et al., 2008) we are still at the beginning of understanding the complex plant-microbe interactions in this dynamic environment (Bisseling et al., 2009). ISR is a powerful mode of action of biological control of plant diseases, but widespread practical applications in agriculture require a rigorous knowledge of the ISR eliciting microbes and their interactions with the rhizosphere microbiome. Positive interactions may occur, as for example antagonistic activity against plant pathogens by combinations of apparently non-antagonistic soil bacteria (De Boer et al., 2007). But also less expected negative effects in which harmless or even beneficial microbes assist incoming pathogens (Venturi and Passos de Silva, 2012). The complexity of the microbiome and the fact that most members are as yet uncultivated (Vartoukian et al., 2010) calls for new approaches. Exciting developments that will enable in depth studies of the functioning of the rhizosphere microbiome include the use of PhyloChips to study the composition of microbial communities (Hazen et al., 2010; Mendes et al., 2011), development of metatranscriptomics (Helbling et al., 2012; Mark et al., 2005), and metabolic profiling of root exudates (Van Dongen et al., 2009). Knowing the advantages and disadvantages of specific interactions will enable sensible applications to control diseases in a sustainable manner.

References

Alabouvette C. 1999;Fusarium wilt suppressive soils: an example of disease suppressive soils. Australas Plant Pathol 28:57–64.
Anderson IC, Cairney JWG. 2004;Diversity and ecology of soil fungal communities: Increased understanding through the application of molecular techniques. Environ Microbiol 6:769–779.
Arumugam M, Raes J, Pelletier E, Le Paslier D, Yamada T, Mende DR, Fernandes GR, Tap J, Bruls T, Batto J-M, Bertalan M, Borruel N, Casellas F, Fernandez L, Gautier L, Hansen T, Hattori M, Hayashi T, Kleerebezem M, Kurokawa K, Leclerc M, Levenez F, Manichanh C, Nielsen HB, Nielsen T, Pons N, Poulain J, Qin J, Sicheritz-Ponten T, Tims S, Torrents D, Ugarte E, Zoetendal EG, Wang J, Guarner F, Pedersen O, De Vos WM, Brunak S, Doré J. MetaHIT Consortium (additional members). Weissenbach J, Ehrlich SD, Bork P. 2011;Enterotypes of the human gut microbiome. Nature 473:174–180.
Audenaert K, Pattery T, Cornelis P, Höfte M. 2002;Induction of systemic resistance to Botrytis cinerea in tomato by Pseudomonas aeruginosa 7NSK2: Role of salicylic acid, pyochelin, and pyocyanin. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact 15:1147–1156.
Baker KF, Cook RJ. 1974. Biological Control of Plant Pathogens W.H. Freeman. San Francisco:
Bakker PAHM, Pieterse CMJ, Van Loon LC. 2007;Induced systemic resistance by fluorescent Pseudomonas spp. Phytopathology 97:239–243.
Bakker PAHM, Ran LX, Pieterse CMJ, Van Loon LC. 2003;Understanding the involvement of induced systemic resistance in rhizobacteria-mediated biocontrol of plant diseases. Can J Plant Pathol 25:5–9.
Berendsen RL, Pieterse CMJ, Bakker PAHM. 2012;The second genome and plant health. Trends Plant Sci 17:478–486.
Bisseling T, Dangl JL, Schultze-Lefert P. 2009;Next-generation communication. Science 324:691.
Bull CT, Weller DM, Thomashow LS. 1991;Relationship between root colonization and suppression of Gaeumannomyces graminis var. tritici by Pseudomonas fluorescens strain 2–79. Phytopathology 81:954–959.
Crow JM. 2011;That Healthy gut feeling. Nature 480:S88–S89.
Da Rocha AB, Hammerschmidt R. 2005;History and perspectives on the use of disease resistance inducers in horticultural crops. HortTechology 15:518–529.
Derrien M, Van Passel MWJ, Van de Bovenkamp JHB, Schipper RG, De Vos WM, Dekker J. 2010;Mucin-bacterial interactions in the human oral cavity and digestive tract. Gut. Microbes 1:254–268.
De Boer W, Wagenaar AM, Klein Gunnewiek PJA, Van Veen JA. 2007;In vitro suppression of fungi caused by combinations of apparently non-antagonistic soil bacteria. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 59:177–185.
De Souza JT, Weller DM, Raaijmakers JM. 2003;Frequency, diversity, and activity of 2,4-diacetylphloroglucinol-producing fluorescent Pseudomonas spp. in Dutch take-all decline soils. Phytopathology 93:54–63.
De Vleesschauwer D, Cornelis P, Höfte M. 2006;Redox-active pyocyanin secreted by Pseudomonas aeruginosa 7NSK2 triggers systemic resistance to Magnaporte grisea but enhances Rhizoctonia solani susceptibility in rice. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact 19:1406–1419.
De Vleesschauwer D, Djavaheri M, Bakker PAHM, Höfte M. 2008;Pseudomonas fluorescens WCS374r-induced systemic resistance in rice against Magnaporthe oryzae is based on pseudobactin-mediated priming for a salicylic acid-repressible multifaceted defense response. Plant Physiol 148:1996–2012.
De Vleesschauwer D, Höfte M. 2009;Rhizobacteria-induced systemic resistance. Adv Bot Res 51:223–281.
Diaz Heijtz R, Wang S, Anuar F, Qian Y, Bjorkholm B, Samuelsson A, Hibberd ML, Forssberg H, Pettersson V. 2011;Normal gut microbiota modulates brain development and behavior. Proc Natl Acad Sc USA 108:3047–3052.
Doornbos RF, Geraats BPJ, Kuramae EE, Van Loon LC, Bakker PAHM. 2011;Effects of jasmonic acid, ethylene, and salicylic acid signaling on the rhizosphere bacterial community of Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact 24:395–407.
Doornbos RF, Van Loon LC, Bakker PAHM. 2009. Beneficial Pseudomonas spp. have altered root colonization on Arabidopsis thaliana mutants affected in the expression of induced systemic resistance. Molecular tools for understanding and improving biocontrol In : Duffy B, Maurhofer M, Keel C, Gessler C, Elad Y, Kiewnick S, eds. IOBC/wprs Bulletin 43p. 307–310.
Duijff BJ, Recorbet G, Bakker PAHM, Loper JE, Lemanceau P. 1999;Microbial antagonism at the root level is involved in the suppression of fusarium wilt by the combination of nonpathogenic Fusarium oxysporum Fo47 and Pseudomonas putida WCS358. Phytopathology 89:1073–1079.
Elsharkawy MM, Shimizu M, Takahashi H, Hyakumachi M. 2012;Induction of systemic resistance against Cucumber mosaic virus by Penicillium simplicissimum GP17-2 in Arabidopsis and tobacco. Plant Pathol 10.1111/j.1365-3059.2011.02573.x.
Fagundes CT, Amaral FA, Teixeira AL, Souza DG, Teixeira MM. 2012;Adapting to environmental stresses: the role of the microbiota in controlling innate immunity and behavioral responses. Immunol Rev 245:250–264.
Fravel D, Olivain C, Alabouvette C. 2003;Fusarium oxysporum and its biocontrol. New Phytol 157:493–502.
Gams W. 2007;Biodiversity of soil-inhabiting fungi. Biodivers Conserv 16:69–72.
Glandorf DCM, Peters LGL, Van der Sluis I, Bakker PAHM, Schippers B. 1993;Crop specificity of rhizosphere pseudomonads and the involvement of root agglutinins. Soil Biol Biochem 25:981–989.
Glandorf DCM, Van der Sluis I, Anderson AJ, Bakker PAHM, Schippers B. 1994;Agglutination, adherence and root colonization by fluorescent pseudomonads. Appl Environ Microbiol 60:1726–1733.
Grenham S, Clarke G, Cryan JF, Dinan TG. 2011;Brain-gut-microbe communication in health and disease. Frontiers in Physiology 2Article 94. 10.3389/fphys.2011.00094.
Hartmann A, Rothballer M, Schmid M. 2008;Lorentz Hiltner, a pioneer in rhizosphere microbial ecology and soil bacteriology research. Plant Soil 312:7–14.
Hartmann A, Schmid M, Van Tuinen D, Berg G. 2009;Plant-driven selection of microbes. Plant Soil 321:235–257.
Hazen TC, Dubinsky EA, DeSantis TZ, Andersen GL, Piceno YM, Singh N, Jansson JK, Probst A, Borglin SE, Fortney JL, Stringfellow WT, Bill M, Conrad ME, Tom LM, Chavarria KL, Alusi TR, Lamendella R, Joyner DC, Spier C, Baelum J, Auer M, Zemla ML, Chakraborty R, Sonnenthal EL, D’haeseleer P, Holman HYN, Osman S, Lu Z, Van Nostrand JD, Deng Y, Zhou J, Mason OU. 2010;Deep-sea oil plume enriches indigenous oil degrading bacteria. Science 330:204–208.
Helbling DE, Ackermann M, Fenner K, Kohler HPE, Johnson DR. 2012;The activity level of a microbial community function can be predicted from its metatranscriptome. ISME J 6:902–904.
Hein JW, Wolfe GV, Blee KA. 2008;Comparison of rhizosphere bacterial communities in Arabidopsis thaliana mutants for systemic acquired resistance. Microb Ecol 55:333–343.
Iavicoli A, Boutet E, Buchala A, Métraux JP. 2003;Induced systemic resistance in Arabidopsis thaliana in response to root inoculation with Pseudomonas fluorescens CHA0. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact 16:851–858.
Johnson KB, DiLeone JA. 1999;Effect of antibiosis on antagonist dose-plant disease response relationships for the biological control of crown gall of tomato and cherry. Phytopathology 89:974–980.
Jourdan E, Henry G, Duby F, Dommes J, Barthelemy JP, Thonart P, Ongena M. 2009;Insights into the defense-related events occurring in plant cells following perception of surfactin-type lipopeptide from Bacillus subtilis. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact 22:456–468.
Katznelson H, Lochhead AG, Timonin MI. 1948;Soil microorganisms and the rhizosphere. Bot Rev 14:543–586.
Khan MS, Zaidi A, Wani PA. 2009;Role of phosphate solubilizing microorganisms in sustainable agriculture – a review. Agron Sustain Dev 27:29–43.
Khoruts A, Dicksved J, Jansson JK, Sadowsky MJ. 2010;Changes in the composition of the human fecal microbiome after bacteriotherapy for recurrent Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea. J Clin Gastroenterol 44:354–360.
Kloepper JW, Ryu C-M, Zhang S. 2004;Induced systemic resistance and promotion of plant growth by Bacillus spp. Phytopathology 94:1259–1266.
Koike N, Hyakumachi M, Kageyama K, Tsuyumu S, Doke N. 2001;Induction of systemic resistance in cucumber against several diseases by plant growth-promoting fungi: lignification and superoxide generation. Eur J Plant Pathol 108:187–196.
Kraiser T, Gras DE, Gutierrez AG, Gonzalez B, Gutierrez RA. 2011;A holistic view of nitrogen acquisition in plants. J Exp Bot 62:1455–1466.
Kyselkova M, Kopecky J, Frapolli M, Defago G, Sagova-Mareckova M, Grundmann GL, Moenne-Loccoz Y. 2009;Comparison of rhizobacterial community composition in soil suppressive or conducive to tobacco black root rot disease. ISME J 3:1127–1138.
Lee B, Lee S, Ryu MR. 2012;Foliar aphid feeding recruits rhizosphere bacteria and primes plant immunity against pathogenic and non-pathogenic bacteria in pepper. Ann Bot 110:281–290.
Leeman M, Van Pelt JA, Den Ouden FM, Heinsbroek M, Bakker PAHM, Schippers B. 1995a;Induction of systemic resistance against fusarium wilt of radish by lipopolysaccharides of Pseudomonas fluorescens. Phytopathology 85:1021–1027.
Leeman M, Van Pelt JA, Hendrickx MJ, Scheffer RJ, Bakker PAHM, Schippers B. 1995b;Biocontrol of fusarium wilt of radish in commercial greenhouse trials by seed treatment with Pseudomonas fluorescens WCS374. Phytopathology 85:1301–1305.
Lemanceau P, Corberand T, Gardan L, Latour X, Laguerre G, Boeufgras JM, Alabouvette C. 1995;Effect of two plant species, flax (Linum usitatissinum L.) and tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) on the diversity of soilborne populations of fluorescent pseudomonads. Appl Environ Microbiol 61:1004–1012.
Ling N, Huang Q, Guo S, Shen Q. 2011;Paenibacillus polymyxa SQR-21 systemically affects root exudates of watermelon to decrease the conidial germination of Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. niveum. Plant Soil 341:485–493.
Mark GL, Dow JM, Kiely PD, Higgins H, Haynes J, Baysse C, Abbas A, Foley T, Franks A, Morrissey J, O’Gara F. 2005;Transcriptome profiling of bacterial responses to root exudates identifies genes involved in microbe-plant interactions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102:17454–17459.
Maurhofer M, Hase C, Meuwly P, Métraux JP, Défago G. 1994;Induction of systemic resistance of tobacco to tobacco necrosis virus by the root-colonizing Pseudomonas fluorescens strain CHA0: Influence of the gacA gene and of pyoverdine production. Phytopathology 84:39–146.
Mavrodi OV, Mavrodi DV, Parejko JA, Thomashow LS, Weller DM. 2012;Irrigation differentially impacts populations of indigenous antibiotic-producing Pseudomonas spp. in the rhizosphere of wheat. Appl Environ Microbiol 78:3214–3220.
Mazurier S, Corberand T, Lemanceau P, Raaijmakers JM. 2009;Phenazine antibiotics produced by fluorescent pseudomonads contribute to natural soil suppressiveness to Fusarium wilt. ISME J 3:977–991.
Mazzola M. 2002;Mechanisms of natural soil suppressiveness to soilborne diseases. Anton Leeuw Int J G 81:557–564.
Mendes R, Kruijt M, De Bruijn I, Dekkers E, Van der Voort M, Schneider JHM, Piceno YM, DeSantis TZ, Andersen GL, Bakker PAHM, Raaijmakers JM. 2011;Deciphering the rhizosphere microbiome for disease-suppressive bacteria. Science 332:1097–1100.
Meziane H, Van der Sluis I, Van Loon LC, Höfte M, Bakker PAHM. 2005;Determinants of Pseudomonas putida WCS358 involved in inducing systemic resistance in plants. Mol Plant Pathol 6:177–185.
Micallef SA, Shiaris MP, Colon-Carmona A. 2009;Influence of Arabidopsis thaliana accessions on rhizobacterial communities and natural variation in root exudates. J Exp Bot 60:1729–1742.
Montesinos E, Bonaterra A. 1996;Dose-response models in biological control of plant pathogens: an empirical verification. Phytopathology 86:464–472.
Ongena M, Jourdan E, Adam A, Paquot M, Brans A, Joris B, Arpigny J-L, Thonart P. 2007;Surfactin and fengycin lipopeptides of Bacillus subtilis as elicitors of induced systemic resistance in plants. Environ Microbiol 9:1084–1090.
Ongena M, Jourdan E, Schäfer M, Kech C, Budzikiewicz H, Luxen A, Thonart P. 2005;Isolation of an N-alkylated benzylamine derivative from Pseudomonas putida BTP1 as elicitor of induced systemic resistance in bean. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact 18:562–569.
Pozo MJ, Verhage A, García-Andrade J, García JM, Azcón-Aguilar C. 2009. Priming plant defences against pathogens by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Mycorrhizas: Functional processes and ecological impact In : Azcón-Aguilar C, Barea JM, Gianinazzi S, Gianinazzi-Pearson V, eds. p. 137–149. Springer-Verlag. Heidelberg:
Press CM, Wilson M, Tuzun S, Kloepper JW. 1997;salicylic acid produced by Serratia marcescens 90–166 is not the primary determinant of induced systemic resistance in cucumber or tobacco. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact 10:761–768.
Raaijmakers JM, Leeman M, Van Oorschot MMP, Van der Sluis I, Schippers B, Bakker PAHM. 1995;Dose-response relationships in biological control of fusarium wilt of radish by Pseudomonas spp. Phytopathology 85:1075–1081.
Raaijmakers JM, Paulitz TC, Steinberg C, Alabouvette C, Moënne-Loccoz Y. 2009;The rhizosphere: a playground and battlefield for soilborne pathogens and beneficial microorganisms. Plant Soil 321:341–361.
Raaijmakers JM, Vlami M, De Souza TJ. 2002;Antibiotic production by bacterial biocontrol agents. Anton Leeuw Int J G 81:537–547.
Raaijmakers JM, Weller DM. 1998;Natural plant protection by 2,4-diacetylphloroglucinol-producing Pseudomonas spp. in take-all decline soils. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact 11:144–152.
Ran LX, Li ZN, Wu GJ, Van Loon LC, Bakker PAHM. 2005;Induction of systemic resistance against bacterial wilt in Eucalyptus urophylla by fluorescent Pseudomonas spp. Eur J Plant Pathol 113:59–70.
Reglinski T, Walters D. 2009. Induced resistance for plant disease control. Disease Control in Crops In : Walters D, ed. p. 62–92. Wiley-Blackwell. Oxford UK:
Rosenzweig N, Tiedje JM, Quensen JF III, Meng Q, Hao JJ. 2012;Microbial communities associated with potato common scab-suppressive soil determined by pyrosequencing analyses. Plant Dis 96:718–725.
Rudrappa T, Czymmek KJ, Paré PW, Bais HP. 2008;Root-secreted malic acid recruits beneficial soil bacteria. Plant Physiol 148:1547–1556.
Ryu CM, Farag MA, Hu CH, Reddy MS, Kloepper JW, Paré PW. 2004;Bacterial volatiles induce systemic resistance in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 134:1017–1026.
Sanguin H, Sarniguet A, Gazengel K, Moenne-Loccoz Y, Grundmann GL. 2009;Rhizosphere bacterial communities associated with disease suppressiveness stages of take-all decline in wheat monoculture. New Phytol 184:694–707.
Schreiner K, Hagn A, Kyselkova M, Moenne-Loccoz Y, Welzl G, Munch JC, Schloter M. 2010;Comparison of barley succession and take-all disease as environmental factors shaping the rhizobacterial community during take-all decline. Appl Environ Microbiol 76:4703–4712.
Schuhegger R, Ihring A, Gantner S, Bahnweg G, Knappe C, Vogg G, Hutzler P, Schmid M, Van Breusegem F, Eberl L, Hartmann A, Langebartels C. 2006;Induction of systemic resistance in tomato by N-acyl-L-homoserine lactone-producing rhizosphere bacteria. Plant Cell Environm 29:909–918.
Segarra G, Van der Ent S, Trillas I, Pieterse CMJ. 2009;MYB72, a node of convergence in induced systemic resistance triggered by a fungal and a bacterial beneficial microbe. Plant Biology 11:90–96.
Shoresh M, Harman GE, Mastouri F. 2010;Induced systemic resistance and plant responses to fungal biocontrol agents. Annu Rev Phytopathol 48:21–43.
Sultana S, Hossain MM, Kubota M, Hyakumachi M. 2009;Induction of systemic resistance in Arabidopsis thaliana in response to a culture filtrate from a plant growth-promoting fungus, Phoma sp. GS8-3. Plant Biology 11:97–104.
Thamer S, Schädler M, Bonte D, Ballhorn DJ. 2011;Dual benefit from a belowground symbiosis: nitrogen fixing rhizobia promote growth and defense against a specialist herbivore in a cyanogenic plant. Plant Soil 341:209–219.
Ton J, Davison S, Van Wees SCM, Van Loon LC, Pieterse CMJ. 2001;The Arabidopsis ISR1 locus controlling rhizobacteria-mediated induced systemic resistance is involved in ethylene signaling. Plant Physiol 125:652–661.
Ton J, Pieterse CMJ, Van Loon LC. 1999;Identification of a locus in Arabidopsis controlling both the expression of rhizobacteria-mediated induced systemic resistance (ISR) and basal resistance against Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact 12:911–918.
Tran H, Ficke A, Asiimwe T, Höfte M, Raaijmakers JM. 2007;Role of the cyclic lipopeptide massetolide A in biological control of Phytophthora infestans and in colonization of tomato plants by Pseudomonas fluorescens. New Phytol 175:731–742.
Turnbaugh PJ, Hamady M, Yatsunenko T, Cantarel BL, Duncan A, Ley RE, Sogin ML, Jones WJ, Roe BA, Affourtit JP, Egholm M, Henrissat B, Heath AC, Knoght R, Gordon JI. 2009;A core gut microbiome in obese and lean twins. Nature 457:480–486.
Turnbaugh PJ, Ley RE, Mahowald MA, Magrini V, Mardis ER, Gordon JI. 2006;An obesity-associated gut microbiome with increased capacity for energy harvest. Nature 444:1027–1031.
Van der Ent S, Verhagen BWM, Van Doorn R, Bakker D, Verlaan MG, Pel MJC, Joosten RG, Proveniers MCG, Van Loon LC, Ton J, Pieterse CMJ. 2008;MYB72 is required in early signaling steps of rhizobacteria-induced systemic resistance in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 146:1293–1304.
Van Dongen JT, Frohlich A, Ramirez-Aguilar SJ, Schauer N, Fernie AR, Erban A, Kopka J, Clark J, Langer A, Geigenberger P. 2009;Transcript and metabolite profiling of the adaptive response to mild decreases in oxygen concentration in the roots of Arabidopsis plants. Annals Bot 103:269–280.
Van der Heijden MGA, Bradgett RD, Van Straalen NM. 2008;The unseen majority: soil microbes as drivers of plant diversity and productivity in terrestrial ecosystems. Ecology Letters 11:296–310.
Van der Heijden MGA, Streitwolf-Engel R, Riedl R, Siegrist S, Neudecker A, Ineichen K, Boller T, Wiemken A, Sanders IR. 2006;The mycorrhizal contribution to plant productivity, plant nutrition and soil structure in experimental grassland. New Phytol 172:739–752.
Van Hulten M, Pelser M, Van Loon LC, Pieterse CMJ, Ton J. 2006;Costs and benefits of priming for defense in Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103:5602–5607.
Van Loon LC, Bakker PAHM. 2005. Induced systemic resistance as a mechanism of disease suppression by rhizobacteria. PGPR: Biocontrol and biofertilization In : Siddiqui ZA, ed. p. 39–66. Springer. Dordrecht, the Netherlands:
Van Loon LC, Bakker PAHM, Pieterse CMJ. 1998;Systemic resistance induced by rhizosphere bacteria. Annu Rev Phytopathol 36:453–483.
Van Peer R, Schippers B. 1992;Lipopolysaccharides of plant-growth promoting Pseudomonas sp. strain WCS417r induce resistance in carnation to Fusarium wilt. Neth J Plant Pathol 98:129–139.
Van Peer R, Niemann GJ, Schippers B. 1991;Induced resistance and phytoalexin accumulation in biological control of fusarium wilt of carnation by Pseudomonas sp. strain WCS417r. Phytopathology 81:728–734.
Van Pelt JA, Van der Sluis I, Pieterse CMJ, Bakker PAHM. 2008. Induced systemic resistance Bioassays in Arabidopsis thaliana. Prospects and applications for plant-associated microbes A laboratory manual Part A: Bacteria In : Sorvari S, Pirttila AM, eds. p. 113–118. BBI Piikkio. Finland:
Vartoukian SR, Palmer RM, Wade WG. 2010;Strategies for culture of ‘unculturable’ bacteria. FEMS Microbiol Lett 309:1–7.
Venturi V, Passos da Silva D. 2012;Incoming pathogens team up with harmless “resident” bacteria. Trends Microbiol 20:160–164.
Wei G, Kloepper JW, Tuzun S. 1991;Induction of systemic resistance of cucumber to Colletotrichum orbiculare by select strains of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria. Phytopathology 81:1508–1512.
Wei G, Kloepper JW, Tuzun S. 1996;Induced systemic resistance to cucumber diseases and increased plant growth by plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria under field conditions. Phytopathology 86:221–224.
Weller DM. 2007;Pseudomonas biocontrol agents of soilborne pathogens: looking back over 30 years. Phytopathology 97:250–256.
Weller DM, Mavrodi DV, Van Pelt JA, Pieterse CMJ, Van Loon LC, Bakker PAHM. 2012;Induced systemic resistance (ISR) in Arabidopsis thaliana against Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato by 2,4-diacetylphloroglucinol-producing Pseudomonas fluorescens. Phytopathology 102:403–412.
Weller DM, Raaijmakers JM, McSpadden Gardener BB, Thomashow LS. 2002;Microbia populations responsible for specific soil suppressiveness to plant pathogens. Annu Rev Phytopathol 40:309–348.
Williams BL, Hornig M, Parekh T, Lipkin WI. 2012;Application of novel PCR-based methods for detection, quantitation, and phylogenetic characterization of Sutterella species in intestinal biopsy samples from children with autism and gastrointestinal disturbances. mBio 3:e00261–11.
Yang J, Kloepper JW, Ryu C-M. 2008;Rhizosphere bacteria help plants tolerate abiotic stress. Trends Plant Sci 14:1–4.
Zamioudis C, Pieterse CMJ. 2012;Modulation of host immunity by beneficial microbes. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact 25:139–150.

Article information Continued